Literature DB >> 16199710

Stable prevalence but changing risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome in child care settings in 2001.

Rachel Y Moon1, Bruce M Sprague, Kantilal M Patel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A total of 20% of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases in the 1990s occurred in child care settings. This is much higher than the 8% expected from Census Bureau data. Factors that were associated with child care SIDS included older age; white race; older, more educated mothers; and unaccustomed prone position. Since these findings, much emphasis has been placed on promoting a safe sleep environment in child care. The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of SIDS occurring in child care in 2001 and to assess risk factors for SIDS in child care.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all SIDS deaths that occurred in 2001 in 13 US states. Information regarding demographics, SIDS risk factors, and child care arrangements were collected and analyzed. Deaths that occurred in child care were compared with deaths that occurred during parental care.
RESULTS: Of 480 deaths, 79 (16.5%) occurred in child care settings. Of these child care deaths, 36.7% occurred in family child care homes, 17.7% occurred in child care centers, 21.3% occurred in relative care, and 17.7% occurred with a nanny/babysitter at home. Infants in child care were more likely to be older and to die between the hours of 8 am and 4 pm and less likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke. There was no difference in usual, found, or placed sleep position between child care and home deaths. Approximately one half of the infants who died of SIDS in both settings were found prone, and 20% of deaths in both settings were among infants who were unaccustomed to prone sleep.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of SIDS deaths in child care has declined slightly but still remains high at 16.5%. Infants in child care are no more likely to be placed or found prone and no more likely to be on an unsafe sleep surface. Educational efforts with child care providers have been effective and should be expanded to unregulated child care providers. In addition, there may be other, yet-unidentified factors in child care that place infants in those settings at higher risk for SIDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199710     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-0924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  5 in total

Review 1.  State-Level Social and Economic Policies and Their Association With Perinatal and Infant Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica L Webster; David Paul; Jonathan Purtle; Robert Locke; Neal D Goldstein
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Environmental risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome in Japan.

Authors:  Masako Hirabayashi; Masao Yoshinaga; Yuichi Nomura; Hiroya Ushinohama; Seiichi Sato; Nobuo Tauchi; Hitoshi Horigome; Hideto Takahashi; Naokata Sumitomo; Hirohiko Shiraishi; Masami Nagashima
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Paid family leave and children health outcomes in OECD countries.

Authors:  Mariam S Khan
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  Cardiac ion channelopathies and the sudden infant death syndrome.

Authors:  Ronald Wilders
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-05

Review 5.  Safe Infant Sleep Interventions: What is the Evidence for Successful Behavior Change?

Authors:  Rachel Y Moon; Fern R Hauck; Eve R Colson
Journal:  Curr Pediatr Rev       Date:  2016
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.