Literature DB >> 16199624

Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation.

Kara M Coassolo1, David M Stamilio, Emmanuelle Paré, Jeffrey F Peipert, Erika Stevens, Deborah B Nelson, George A Macones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) failure and major complications in women attempting VBAC before and after the estimated date of delivery (EDD)
METHODS: This was a 5-year retrospective cohort study in 17 university and community hospitals of women with at least 1 prior cesarean delivery. Women who attempted VBAC before the EDD were compared with those at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between delivery beyond the EDD and VBAC failure or complication rate.
RESULTS: A total of 11,587 women in the cohort attempted VBAC. Women past 40 weeks of gestation were more likely to have a failed VBAC. After controlling for confounders, the increased risk of a failed VBAC beyond 40 weeks remained significant (31.3% compared with 22.2%, odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.50). The risk of uterine rupture (1.1% compared with 1.0%) or overall morbidity (2.7% compared with 2.1%) was not significantly increased in the women attempting VBAC beyond the EDD. When the cohort was defined as 41 weeks or more of gestation, the risk of a failed VBAC was again significantly increased (35.4% compared with 24.3%, odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.53), but the risk of uterine rupture or overall morbidity was not increased.
CONCLUSION: Women beyond 40 weeks of gestation can safely attempt VBAC, although the risk of VBAC failure is increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199624     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000179389.82986.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Maternal and obstetrical factors associated with a successful trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Abdelazim; Assem A M Elbiaa; Mohamed Al-Kadi; Amr H Yehia; Bassam M Sami Nusair; Mohannad Abu Faza
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Outcome of the vaginal birth after cesarean section during the second birth order in West Kazakhstan.

Authors:  K Zh Sakiyeva; Ibrahim A Abdelazim; M Farghali; S S Zhumagulova; M B Dossimbetova; M S Sarsenbaev; G Zhurabekova; S Shikanova
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Professional ethics, VBAC and COVID-19 pandemic: A challenge to be resolved (Review).

Authors:  Alexandru Carauleanu; Ingrid Andrada Tanasa; Dragos Nemescu; Demetra Socolov
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  A survey of access to trial of labor in California hospitals in 2012.

Authors:  Mary K Barger; Jennifer Templeton Dunn; Sage Bearman; Megan DeLain; Elena Gates
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Obstetric factors for unsuccessful trial of labor in second-order birth following previous cesarean.

Authors:  Saima Aziz Siddiqui
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.