Literature DB >> 16199459

A comparison of physician examiners and trained assessors in a high-stakes OSCE setting.

Susan Humphrey-Murto1, Sydney Smee, Claire Touchie, Timothy J Wood, David E Blackmore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medical Council of Canada (MCC) administers an objective structured clinical examination for licensure. Traditionally, physician examiners (PE) have evaluated these examinees. Recruitment of physicians is becoming more difficult. Determining if alternate scorers can be used is of increasing importance.
METHOD: In 2003, the MCC ran a study using trained assessors (TA) simultaneously with PEs. Four examination centers and three history-taking stations were selected. Health care workers were recruited as the TAs.
RESULTS: A 3x2x4 mixed analyses of variance indicated no significant difference between scorers (F1,462=.01, p=.94). There were significant interaction effects, which were, localized to site 1/station 3, site 3/station 2, and site 4/station1. Pass/fail decisions would have misclassified 14.4-25.01% of examinees.
CONCLUSION: Trained assessors may be a valid alternative to PE for completing checklists in history-taking stations, but their role in completing global ratings is not supported by this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199459     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  Documenting clinical performance problems among medical students: feedback for learner remediation and curriculum enhancement.

Authors:  Brian E Mavis; Dianne P Wagner; Rebecca C Henry; Laura Carravallah; Jon Gold; Joel Maurer; Asad Mohmand; Janet Osuch; Steven Roskos; Andrew Saxe; Aron Sousa; Vince Winkler Prins
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2013-07-22

2.  The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.

Authors:  Lauren Chong; Silas Taylor; Matthew Haywood; Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Boaz Shulruf
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2017-12-27

3.  Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.

Authors:  Peter Yeates; Natalie Cope; Ashley Hawarden; Hannah Bradshaw; Gareth McCray; Matt Homer
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Agreement between simulated patients and faculty: Assessment of communication skills during objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  Farheen Yousuf; Naveed Yousuf
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  The role of training in student examiner rating performance in a student-led mock OSCE.

Authors:  Jian Hui Koo; Kim Yao Ong; Yun Ting Yap; Kum Ying Tham
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.