Literature DB >> 16199343

Challenges, controversies, and advances in aortic catastrophes.

Luis H Haro1, Michelle Krajicek, Joseph K Lobl.   

Abstract

Emergency physicians (EPs) are commonly faced with life-threatening entities. Particularly challenging are the aortic catastrophes, such as penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs), intramural hematomas (IMHs), and atypical presentations of acute aortic dissections and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Several factors account for this: (1) the rapidly evolving knowledge (particularly in the pathogenesis and precursors of aortic dissection [AD]), (2) the lack of comfort caused by infrequent exposure, (3) the misconceptions about the work up and treatment, (4) the lack of emergent vascular surgery back up in the community, and finally (5) the high short-term mortality and missed rates. Finally, the media has publicized cases of celebrities and other patients who experienced fatal outcomes when their aortic catastrophes went undiagnosed. Practitioners of emergency care should, therefore, understand the challenges, be aware of the recent advances, and help limit the controversies in the evaluation and management of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199343     DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2005.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am        ISSN: 0733-8627            Impact factor:   2.264


  2 in total

1.  Abdominal aneurysm diagnosed by plain radiograph.

Authors:  Bruce M Lo
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10-28

2.  Images in emergency medicine: aortic dissection.

Authors:  Kristi A Stanley; Mel Herbert
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.