Literature DB >> 16199322

Cervical brachytherapy utilizing ring applicator: comparison of standard and conformal loading.

Susan Brooks1, Peter Bownes, Gerry Lowe, Lynda Bryant, Peter J Hoskin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Afterloading high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) treatment of cervical cancer with cross-sectional imaging and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction offers opportunities for individualized conformal treatment planning rather than fixed point-A dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 2003 and September 2004, 15 patients with FIGO Stage 1B-4A cervical carcinoma, median age 56 years, were treated with radical external-beam radiotherapy to pelvis, including paraortic nodes if positive on staging investigations. Fourteen patients received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy. All patients received HDR brachytherapy administered by intrauterine tube and ring applicator. Clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR)--rectum, bladder, and small bowel--were outlined from postinsertion CT planning scans. Planning target volume (PTV) was derived by use of 2-mm to 3-mm 3D expansion. A standard plan was produced that delivered 6 Gy to point A, and a second plan delivered 6 Gy to PTV. Constraints were defined for the OAR: bladder, 6 Gy; rectum, 5 Gy; and small bowel, 5 Gy. Dosimetric comparison was performed by use of the Baltas conformal index (COIN).
RESULTS: Mean COIN values were 0.39 for conformal plans and 0.33 for standard plans (p = 0.001); mean D95 values were 4.79 Gy and 4.50 Gy, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The majority of patients achieved a plan closer to ideal for coverage of PTV, with minimization of radiation received by normal tissues for conformal loading measured by COIN compared with fixed point-A prescription that used the cervical ring applicator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199322     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Dose escalation in brachytherapy for cervical cancer: impact on (or increased need for) MRI-guided plan optimisation.

Authors:  A M Paton; K E Chalmers; H Coomber; A L Cameron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of graphical optimization or IPSA for improving brachytheraphy plans associated with inadequate target coverage for cervical cancer.

Authors:  ZhiJie Liu; HuanQing Liang; Xiao Wang; HaiMing Yang; Ye Deng; TingJun Luo; ChaoFeng Yang; Min Lu; QingGuo Fu; XiaoDong Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Commissioning of Varian ring & tandem HDR applicators: reproducibility and interobserver variability of dwell position offsets.

Authors:  Ryan McMahon; Tingliang Zhuang; Beverly A Steffey; Haijun Song; Oana I Craciunescu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Influence of dwell time homogeneity error weight parameter on treatment plan quality in inverse optimized high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy using SagiPlan.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Elham Shahcheraghi-Motlagh; Mohammad Hadi Gholami; Alireza Shakibafard; Sareh Karbasi; Reza Fardid
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  Physics-aspects of dose accuracy in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: source dosimetry, treatment planning, equipment performance and in vivo verification techniques.

Authors:  Antony Palmer; David Bradley; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-30

6.  Investigation of whether in-room CT-based adaptive intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer is robust against interfractional location variations of organs and/or applicators.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Oku; Hidetaka Arimura; Tran Thi Thao Nguyen; Yoshiyuki Hiraki; Masahiko Toyota; Yasumasa Saigo; Takashi Yoshiura; Hideki Hirata
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.724

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.