Literature DB >> 16198638

Bioinformatics and biological reality.

Ingvar Johansson1.   

Abstract

Many bioinformaticians seem to shy away from believing that we can have knowledge about a mind-independent biological reality. This paper attempts to show that this tendency is neither well-founded nor harmless. Even though most bioinformaticians work only with terms and concepts, they cannot altogether disregard the question whether these terms and concepts have any real referents. The paper consists of three parts. Part I clarifies three different positions in the philosophy of science with which it would be good for the philosophical outlook of bioinformaticians to become familiar, and it defends one of them, Karl Popper's epistemological realism. Part II discusses a distinction which is necessary for epistemological realism and is of practical importance for bioinformatics, the distinction between the use and mention of terms and concepts. Part III, finally, contains some brief concluding words about realism, both in general and in relation to bioinformatics.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198638     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  3 in total

Review 1.  Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions.

Authors:  Olivier Bodenreider; Robert Stevens
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 2.  Literature review of SNOMED CT use.

Authors:  Dennis Lee; Nicolette de Keizer; Francis Lau; Ronald Cornet
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Adding a little reality to building ontologies for biology.

Authors:  Phillip Lord; Robert Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.