Literature DB >> 16198570

Use of a Behavioural Pain Scale to assess pain in ventilated, unconscious and/or sedated patients.

Jeanne Young1, Jo Siffleet, Sue Nikoletti, Thérèse Shaw.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Current empirical evidence supports claims that pain in sedated, unconscious Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients is underrated and under-treated. Given the severity of ICU patients' illness pain management, whilst important, may not be considered a priority and therefore can be easily overlooked. The aim of this study was to validate the Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients by evaluating facial expressions, upper limb movements and compliance with mechanical ventilation.
METHODS: A prospective, descriptive repeated measures study design was used to assess the validity and reliability of the BPS for assessing pain in critically ill patients undergoing routine painful (repositioning) and non-painful (eye care) procedures.
RESULTS: An average of 73% of BPS scores increased (indicating pain) after patients were repositioned, as opposed to 14% after eye care. This increase was statistically significant for repositioning (p < 0.003) but not for eye care (p > 0.3). The odds of an increase in BPS between pre- and post-procedure assessments was more than 25 times higher for repositioning compared with eye care (p < 0.0001), after controlling for analgesics and sedatives.
CONCLUSION: The BPS was found to be a valid and reliable tool in the assessment of pain in the unconscious sedated patient. Results also highlighted that traditional pain indicators, such as fluctuations in haemodynamic parameters, are not always an accurate measure for the assessment of pain in unconscious patients and as such more objective pain assessment measures are essential. Finally, further validation of the BPS and identification of other painful routine procedures is needed to enhance pain management delivery for unconscious patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198570     DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2005.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


  34 in total

1.  Pupillometric Monitoring of Nociception in Cardiac Anesthesia.

Authors:  Felix Bartholmes; Nathalie M Malewicz; Melanie Ebel; Peter K Zahn; Christine H Meyer-Frießem
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Pain Assessment in Noncommunicative Adult Palliative Care Patients.

Authors:  Deborah B McGuire; Karen Snow Kaiser; Mary Ellen Haisfield-Wolfe; Florence Iyamu
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 3.  Facial expression and pain in the critically ill non-communicative patient: state of science review.

Authors:  Mamoona Arif-Rahu; Mary Jo Grap
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.072

4.  Pain Assessment and Management in Critically ill Intubated Patients in Jordan: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shahnaz Mohammad Ayasrah; Teresa Mary O'Neill; Maysoon Saleem Abdalrahim; Manal Mohammed Sutary; Muna Suliman Kharabsheh
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2014-07

5.  Assessing pain in non-intubated critically ill patients unable to self report: an adaptation of the Behavioral Pain Scale.

Authors:  Gérald Chanques; Jean-François Payen; Grégoire Mercier; Sylvie de Lattre; Eric Viel; Boris Jung; Moussa Cissé; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Predictors and use of nonpharmacologic interventions for procedural pain associated with turning among hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Bonnie Faigeles; Jill Howie-Esquivel; Christine Miaskowski; Julie Stanik-Hutt; Carol Thompson; Cheri White; Lorie Rietman Wild; Kathleen Puntillo
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.929

7.  Fentanyl as pre-emptive treatment of pain associated with turning mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Gemma Robleda; Ferran Roche-Campo; Maria-Àngels Sendra; Marta Navarro; Ana Castillo; Ainhoa Rodríguez-Arias; Elena Juanes-Borrego; Ignasi Gich; Gerard Urrutia; José M Nicolás-Arfelis; Kathleen Puntillo; Jordi Mancebo; Josep E Baños
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The transition from acute to chronic pain: might intensive care unit patients be at risk?

Authors:  Maria Kyranou; Kathleen Puntillo
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  The pain, agitation, and delirium practice guidelines for adult critically ill patients: a post-publication perspective.

Authors:  Yoanna Skrobik; Gerald Chanques
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: a prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project).

Authors:  Audrey de Jong; Nicolas Molinari; Sylvie de Lattre; Claudine Gniadek; Julie Carr; Mathieu Conseil; Marie-Pierre Susbielles; Boris Jung; Samir Jaber; Gérald Chanques
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.