Literature DB >> 16198506

PSA nadir predicts biochemical and distant failures after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a multi-institutional analysis.

Michael E Ray1, Howard D Thames, Larry B Levy, Eric M Horwitz, Patrick A Kupelian, Alvaro A Martinez, Jeff M Michalski, Thomas M Pisansky, William U Shipley, Michael J Zelefsky, Anthony L Zietman, Deborah A Kuban.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the significance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (nPSA) and the time to nPSA (T(nPSA)) in predicting biochemical or clinical disease-free survival (PSA-DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy (RT) for clinical Stage T1b-T2 prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine participating institutions submitted data on 4839 patients treated between 1986 and 1995 for Stage T1b-T2cN0-NxM0 prostate cancer. All patients were treated definitively with RT alone to doses > or =60 Gy, without neoadjuvant or planned adjuvant androgen suppression. A total of 4833 patients with a median follow-up of 6.3 years met the criteria for analysis. Two endpoints were considered: (1) PSA-DFS, defined as freedom from PSA failure (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition), initiation of androgen suppression after completion of RT, or documented local or distant failure; and (2) DMFS, defined as freedom from clinically apparent distant failure. In patients with failure, nPSA was defined as the lowest PSA measurement before any failure. In patients without failure, nPSA was the lowest PSA measurement during the entire follow-up period. T(nPSA) was calculated from the completion of RT to the nPSA date.
RESULTS: A greater nPSA level and shorter T(nPSA) were associated with decreased PSA-DFS and DMFS in all patients and in all risk categories (low [Stage T1b, T1c, or T2a, Gleason score < or =6, and PSA level < or =10 ng/mL], intermediate [Stage T1b, T1c, or T2a, Gleason score < or =6, and PSA level >10 but < or =20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b or T2c, Gleason score < or =6, and PSA level < or =20 ng/mL, or Gleason score 7 and PSA level < or =20 ng/mL], and high [Gleason score 8-10 or PSA level >20 ng/mL]), regardless of RT dose. The 8-year PSA-DFS and DMFS rate for patients with nPSA <0.5 ng/mL was 75% and 97%; nPSA > or =0.5 but <1.0 ng/mL, 52% and 96%; nPSA > or =1.0 but <2.0 ng/mL, 40% and 91%; and nPSA > or =2.0 ng/mL, 17% and 73%, respectively. The 8-year PSA-DFS and DMFS rate for patients with T(nPSA) <6 months was 27% and 66%; T(nPSA) > or =6 but <12 months, 31% and 85%; T(nPSA) > or =12 but <24 months, 42% and 94%; and T(nPSA) > or =24 months, 75% and 99%, respectively. A shorter T(nPSA) was associated with decreased PSA-DFS and DMFS, regardless of the nPSA. Both nPSA and T(nPSA) were significant predictors of PSA-DFS and DMFS in multivariate models incorporating clinical stage, Gleason score, initial PSA level, and RT dose. The significance of nPSA and T(nPSA) was supported by landmark analysis, as well as by analysis of nPSA and T(nPSA) as time-dependent covariates. A dose > or =70 Gy was associated with a lower nPSA level and longer T(nPSA) in all risk categories, and a greater dose was significantly associated with greater PSA-DFS and DMFS in multivariate analysis. Regression analysis confirmed that higher clinical stage, Gleason score, and initial PSA were associated with a greater nPSA level.
CONCLUSION: The results of this large, multi-institutional analysis of 4833 patients have provided important evidence that nPSA and T(nPSA) after definitive external beam RT are not only predictive of a predominantly PSA endpoint (PSA-DFS), but are also predictive of distant metastasis in all clinical risk categories. Greater RT doses were associated with lower nPSA, longer T(nPSA), and improved PSA-DFS and DMFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198506     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  42 in total

1.  Biochemical control of prostate cancer with iodine-125 brachytherapy alone: experience from a single institution.

Authors:  Larissa Pereira da Ponte Amadei; João Luis Fernandes Silva; Samir Abdallah Hanna; Cecília Maria Kalil Haddad; Adriano João Nesrallah; Heloisa Andrade Carvalho
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Timing of Prostate-specific Antigen Nadir After Radical Prostatectomy and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Stephanie L Skove; Lauren E Howard; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Daniel M Moreira; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Prostate Cancer: assessing the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy using quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Yousef Mazaheri; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Joshua Berkowitz; Joshua E Lantos; Xin Pei; Michael J Zelefsky; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  May non-metastatic clinically localized castration-resistant prostate cancer after primary androgen ablation benefit from salvage prostate radiotherapy?

Authors:  Angela Botticella; Alessia Guarneri; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Niccolò Giaj Levra; Fernando Munoz; Riccardo Ragona; Paolo Gontero; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Dose-response with stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional analysis of prostate-specific antigen kinetics and biochemical control.

Authors:  Rebecca G Levin-Epstein; Naomi Y Jiang; Xiaoyan Wang; Shrinivasa K Upadhyaya; Sean P Collins; Simeng Suy; Nima Aghdam; Constantine Mantz; Alan J Katz; Leszek Miszczyk; Aleksandra Napieralska; Agnieszka Namysl-Kaletka; Nicholas Prionas; Hilary Bagshaw; Mark K Buyyounouski; Minsong Cao; Nzhde Agazaryan; Audrey Dang; Ye Yuan; Patrick A Kupelian; Nicholas G Zaorsky; Daniel E Spratt; Osama Mohamad; Felix Y Feng; Brandon A Mahal; Paul C Boutros; Arun U Kishan; Jesus Juarez; David Shabsovich; Tommy Jiang; Sartajdeep Kahlon; Ankur Patel; Jay Patel; Nicholas G Nickols; Michael L Steinberg; Donald B Fuller; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Mechanistic modelling of prostate-specific antigen dynamics shows potential for personalized prediction of radiation therapy outcome.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Víctor M Pérez-García; Alfonso Mariño; Luis A Pérez-Romasanta; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Hormone therapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Payne; A Khan; S Chowdhury; R Davda
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Clinical impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on patient management and outcome, including all patients referred for an increase in PSA level during the first year after its clinical introduction.

Authors:  Julian Müller; Daniela A Ferraro; Urs J Muehlematter; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Sarah Kedzia; Daniel Eberli; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Tullio Sulser; Daniel M Schmid; Aurelius Omlin; Alexander Müller; Thomas Zilli; Hubert John; Helmut Kranzbuehler; Philipp A Kaufmann; Gustav K von Schulthess; Irene A Burger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Normalization of prostate specific antigen in patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Schmitz; Gilbert D A Padula; Patrick Y Chun; Alan T Davis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Biochemical and clinical outcomes after high-dose salvage radiotherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angela Botticella; Alessia Guarneri; Niccolo' Giai Levra; Fernando Munoz; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Nadia Rondi; Serena Badellino; Francesca Arcadipane; Mario Levis; Riccardo Ragona; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.