Literature DB >> 16198403

Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry.

Alvin G Wee1, Delwin T Lindsey, Shanglun Kuo, William M Johnston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The use of calibrated, commercial digital cameras for dental applications is promising. The color accuracy of various calibration models were evaluated as applied to three commercial digital cameras for use in dental color matching.
METHODS: CIE LAB values of 264 color patches and 65 shade tabs were measured with a spectroradiometer. Digital images of the samples were taken with the Nikon D100, Canon D60 and Sigma SD9 cameras. Four regression models were formulated from the color patch CIE LAB and the digital image values. Shade tab CIE LAB colors were predicted by applying the digital image values into the calibration models and were compared to the measured CIE LAB values. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test determined if the 12 camera/calibration models differed significantly from the color measurement setup.
RESULTS: Every camera/calibration model (DeltaE's ranging from 1.79 to 5.25) showed a statistically significant difference from the color measurement setup. SIGNIFICANCE: Commercial SLR digital cameras when combined with the appropriate calibration protocols showed potential for use in the color replication process of clinical dentistry.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198403      PMCID: PMC1808262          DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  10 in total

1.  Recording and communicating shade with digital photography: concepts and considerations.

Authors:  Pascal Zyman; Jean-Marc Etienne
Journal:  Pract Proced Aesthet Dent       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  Digital shade analysis and verification: a case report and discussion.

Authors:  S J Chu; D P Tarnow
Journal:  Pract Proced Aesthet Dent       Date:  2001-03

3.  Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain.

Authors:  Alvin G Wee; Peter Monaghan; William M Johnston
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Influence of window size in small-window colour measurement, particularly of teeth.

Authors:  R A Bolt; J J Bosch; J C Coops
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns.

Authors:  R D Douglas; J D Brewer
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Precision of in vivo colorimetric assessments of teeth.

Authors:  R D Douglas
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain.

Authors:  R R Seghi; E R Hewlett; J Kim
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry.

Authors:  W M Johnston; E C Kao
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers.

Authors:  I E Ruyter; K Nilner; B Moller
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisors.

Authors:  A Hasegawa; I Ikeda; S Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.426

  10 in total
  22 in total

1.  Measurement of color for craniofacial structures using a 45/0-degree optical configuration.

Authors:  David J Gozalo-Diaz; Delwin T Lindsey; William M Johnston; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition.

Authors:  Funda Bayindir; Shanglun Kuo; William M Johnston; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Development of digital shade guides for color assessment using a digital camera with ring flashes.

Authors:  Oi-Hong Tung; Yu-Lin Lai; Yi-Ching Ho; I-Chiang Chou; Shyh-Yuan Lee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Use of commercial off-the-shelf digital cameras for scientific data acquisition and scene-specific color calibration.

Authors:  Derya Akkaynak; Tali Treibitz; Bei Xiao; Umut A Gürkan; Justine J Allen; Utkan Demirci; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  The development of a novel shade selection program for fixed shade translucent dental materials.

Authors:  Melody N Carney; William M Johnston
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparative evaluation of color change between two types of acrylic resin and flexible resin after thermo cycling. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Nadira A Hatim; Omar Zeno Al-Tahho
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-05-05

7.  A novel regression model from RGB image data to spectroradiometric correlates optimized for tooth colored shades.

Authors:  Melody N Carney; William M Johnston
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  [Application and exploration of Smile Lite MDP portable photography system in aesthetic photography of anterior teeth].

Authors:  M Liu; J D Zhang; H Q Ye; Y J Zhao; X B Zhao; W Y Zhao; Y S Liu; Y S Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

9.  Coverage error of gingival shade guide systems in measuring color of attached anterior gingiva.

Authors:  Funda Bayindir; Yusuf Ziya Bayindir; David J Gozalo-Diaz; Alvin G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Forensic sexual assault examination and genital injury: is skin color a source of health disparity?

Authors:  Marilyn S Sommers; Therese M Zink; Jamison D Fargo; Rachel B Baker; Carol Buschur; Donna Z Shambley-Ebron; Bonnie S Fisher
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.