Literature DB >> 16198383

Is the disease risk associated with good self-reported health constant across the socio-economic spectrum?

J Adams1, M White.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-reported health is likely to be dependent on two key assessments: that of one's own health and that of the best health that could be expected. As many health outcomes are known to vary according to socio-economic position (SEP), it is possible that assessments of the best health that could be expected will vary with SEP. It is, therefore, possible that the disease risk associated with different levels of self-reported health varies according to SEP. We investigated this using data from the 1998 Health Survey for England.
METHODS: Disease risk was measured as systolic blood pressure and body mass index (BMI), and SEP was measured as occupational social class. Associations between social class and the markers of disease risk were investigated in those reporting different levels of self-reported health using linear regression in order to control for age.
RESULTS: There were statistically significant socio-economic variations in systolic blood pressure and BMI (in women only) in those who reported their health as good or very good. No such socio-economic variations in disease risk were seen amongst those reporting their health as less than good.
CONCLUSIONS: The meaning of self-reported health, in terms of disease risk, may not be comparable across the socio-economic spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198383     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  7 in total

1.  Does self-rated health mean the same thing across socioeconomic groups? Evidence from biomarker data.

Authors:  Jennifer Beam Dowd; Anna Zajacova
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  SRH and HrQOL: does social position impact differently on their link with health status?

Authors:  Cyrille Delpierre; Michelle Kelly-Irving; Mette Munch-Petersen; Valérie Lauwers-Cances; Geetanjali D Datta; Benoît Lepage; Thierry Lang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Socio-Economic Differences in the Association between Self-Reported and Clinically Present Diabetes and Hypertension: Secondary Analysis of a Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Gerald Tompkins; Lynne F Forrest; Jean Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The association between self-rated health and underlying biomarker levels is modified by age, gender, and household income: Evidence from Understanding Society - The UK Household Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  M Pia Chaparro; Amanda Hughes; Meena Kumari; Michaela Benzeval
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2019-05-08

5.  Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Germany: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional health surveys between 2003 and 2012.

Authors:  Benjamin Wachtler; Jens Hoebel; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Reliability and predictive validity of two scales of self-rated health in China: results from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

Authors:  Yuwei Pan; Jitka Pikhartova; Martin Bobak; Hynek Pikhart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.135

7.  Associations of chronic conditions, APOE4 allele, stress factors, and health behaviors with self-rated health.

Authors:  Wen Hu; Jiehua Lu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.921

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.