Literature DB >> 16198373

Domain rearrangements in protein evolution.

Asa K Björklund1, Diana Ekman, Sara Light, Johannes Frey-Skött, Arne Elofsson.   

Abstract

Most eukaryotic proteins are multi-domain proteins that are created from fusions of genes, deletions and internal repetitions. An investigation of such evolutionary events requires a method to find the domain architecture from which each protein originates. Therefore, we defined a novel measure, domain distance, which is calculated as the number of domains that differ between two domain architectures. Using this measure the evolutionary events that distinguish a protein from its closest ancestor have been studied and it was found that indels are more common than internal repetition and that the exchange of a domain is rare. Indels and repetitions are common at both the N and C-terminals while they are rare between domains. The evolution of the majority of multi-domain proteins can be explained by the stepwise insertions of single domains, with the exception of repeats that sometimes are duplicated several domains in tandem. We show that domain distances agree with sequence similarity and semantic similarity based on gene ontology annotations. In addition, we demonstrate the use of the domain distance measure to build evolutionary trees. Finally, the evolution of multi-domain proteins is exemplified by a closer study of the evolution of two protein families, non-receptor tyrosine kinases and RhoGEFs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198373     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  85 in total

1.  Evolution and structural diversification of Nictaba-like lectin genes in food crops with a focus on soybean (Glycine max).

Authors:  Sofie Van Holle; Pierre Rougé; Els J M Van Damme
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Domain mobility in proteins: functional and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Malay Kumar Basu; Eugenia Poliakov; Igor B Rogozin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  The architectural design of networks of protein domain architectures.

Authors:  Chia-Hsin Hsu; Chien-Kuo Chen; Ming-Jing Hwang
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Nature of the protein universe.

Authors:  Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mutational and structural analysis of L-N-carbamoylase reveals new insights into a peptidase M20/M25/M40 family member.

Authors:  Sergio Martínez-Rodríguez; Abel García-Pino; Francisco Javier Las Heras-Vázquez; Josefa María Clemente-Jiménez; Felipe Rodríguez-Vico; Juan M García-Ruiz; Remy Loris; Jose Antonio Gavira
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Protein comparison at the domain architecture level.

Authors:  Byungwook Lee; Doheon Lee
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Algorithm of OMA for large-scale orthology inference.

Authors:  Alexander C J Roth; Gaston H Gonnet; Christophe Dessimoz
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies.

Authors:  Catia Pesquita; Daniel Faria; André O Falcão; Phillip Lord; Francisco M Couto
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  The evolutionary history of protein domains viewed by species phylogeny.

Authors:  Song Yang; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  d-Omix: a mixer of generic protein domain analysis tools.

Authors:  Duangdao Wichadakul; Somrak Numnark; Supawadee Ingsriswang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.