STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) durably unites dissimilar hard brittle enamel and tough flexible dentin. In contrast to artificial bonds between restorations and dentin, the DEJ rarely fails except when it is affected by inherited disorders. Knowledge of DEJ toughening mechanisms is important in understanding inherited disorders, in biomimetic engineering of junctions between artificial restorations and teeth, and in tissue-engineering a DEJ. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify specific DEJ-zone failure mechanisms and to survey the fracture toughness of the human DEJ zone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fracture toughness indentations were made at 3 sites across the DEJ zone of 10 human incisor teeth. Failure modes identified using optical microscopy and fracture toughness (MPa.m(1/2)) were calculated following Vickers microindentation. Site mean values were then calculated and compared using 1-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The DEJ did not undergo catastrophic interfacial delamination; instead, damage was distributed over a broad zone. The primary damage mode involved cracking and damage dispersion in the specialized first-formed enamel close to the DEJ. Multiple, somewhat convoluted and sometimes branching, cracks spread and diffused damage over a wide area of adjacent enamel rather than producing catastrophic interfacial failure. Other secondary mechanisms included short microcracks in the DEJ adjacent dentin with possible cracked bridging, as well as plastic deformation of the DEJ without delamination. A DEJ-zone fracture toughness of approximately 0.8 to 0.9 MPa.m(1/2) was calculated. CONCLUSION: DEJ-zone damage occurred primarily within the adjacent layer of specialized first-formed enamel, and the optical DEJ interface resisted delamination.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) durably unites dissimilar hard brittle enamel and tough flexible dentin. In contrast to artificial bonds between restorations and dentin, the DEJ rarely fails except when it is affected by inherited disorders. Knowledge of DEJ toughening mechanisms is important in understanding inherited disorders, in biomimetic engineering of junctions between artificial restorations and teeth, and in tissue-engineering a DEJ. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify specific DEJ-zone failure mechanisms and to survey the fracture toughness of the human DEJ zone. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Fracture toughness indentations were made at 3 sites across the DEJ zone of 10 human incisor teeth. Failure modes identified using optical microscopy and fracture toughness (MPa.m(1/2)) were calculated following Vickers microindentation. Site mean values were then calculated and compared using 1-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The DEJ did not undergo catastrophic interfacial delamination; instead, damage was distributed over a broad zone. The primary damage mode involved cracking and damage dispersion in the specialized first-formed enamel close to the DEJ. Multiple, somewhat convoluted and sometimes branching, cracks spread and diffused damage over a wide area of adjacent enamel rather than producing catastrophic interfacial failure. Other secondary mechanisms included short microcracks in the DEJ adjacent dentin with possible cracked bridging, as well as plastic deformation of the DEJ without delamination. A DEJ-zone fracture toughness of approximately 0.8 to 0.9 MPa.m(1/2) was calculated. CONCLUSION: DEJ-zone damage occurred primarily within the adjacent layer of specialized first-formed enamel, and the optical DEJ interface resisted delamination.
Authors: Rodrigo S Lacruz; Charles E Smith; Pierre Moffatt; Eugene H Chang; Timothy G Bromage; Pablo Bringas; Antonio Nanci; Sanjeev K Baniwal; Joseph Zabner; Michael J Welsh; Ira Kurtz; Michael L Paine Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Rodrigo S Lacruz; Antonio Nanci; Shane N White; Xin Wen; Hongjun Wang; Sylvia F Zalzal; Vivian Q Luong; Verna L Schuetter; Peter S Conti; Ira Kurtz; Michael L Paine Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-06-06 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Malcolm L Snead; Dan-Hong Zhu; Yaping Lei; Wen Luo; Pablo O Bringas; Henry M Sucov; Richard J Rauth; Michael L Paine; Shane N White Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2011-02-05 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Rodrigo S Lacruz; Steven J Brookes; Xin Wen; Jaime M Jimenez; Susanna Vikman; Ping Hu; Shane N White; S Petter Lyngstadaas; Curtis T Okamoto; Charles E Smith; Michael L Paine Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Rick J Rauth; Karen S Potter; Amanda Y-W Ngan; Deema M Saad; Rana Mehr; Vivian Q Luong; Verna L Schuetter; Vetea G Miklus; PeiPei Chang; Michael L Paine; Rodrigo S Lacruz; Malcolm L Snead; Shane N White Journal: J Calif Dent Assoc Date: 2009-12