Literature DB >> 16197692

Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.

Jeffrey S Maxwell1, Alexander J Shackman, Richard J Davidson.   

Abstract

Planned and reflexive behaviors often occur in the presence of emotional stimuli and within the context of an individual's acute emotional state. Therefore, determining the manner in which emotion and attention interact is an important step toward understanding how we function in the real world. Participants in the current investigation viewed centrally displayed, task-irrelevant, face distractors (angry, neutral, happy) while performing a lateralized go/no-go continuous performance task. Lateralized go targets and no-go lures that did not spatially overlap with the faces were employed to differentially probe processing in the left (LH) and right (RH) cerebral hemispheres. There was a significant interaction between expression and hemisphere, with an overall pattern such that angry distractors were associated with relatively more RH inhibitory errors than neutral or happy distractors and happy distractors with relatively more LH inhibitory errors than angry or neutral distractors. Simple effects analyses confirmed that angry faces differentially interfered with RH relative to LH inhibition and with inhibition in the RH relative to happy faces. A significant three-way interaction further revealed that state anxiety moderated relations between emotional expression and hemisphere. Under conditions of low cognitive load, more intense anxiety was associated with relatively greater RH than LH impairment in the presence of both happy and threatening distractors. By contrast, under high load, only angry distractors produced greater RH than LH interference as a function of anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197692     DOI: 10.1162/0898929054985437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Happy and fearful emotion in cues and targets modulate event-related potential indices of gaze-directed attentional orienting.

Authors:  Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Joseph B Hopfinger; Reiko Graham; Jacqueline M Detwiler; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Can theories of visual representation help to explain asymmetries in amygdala function?

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Impaired identity recognition of faces with emotional expressions in body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Jamie Donald Feusner; Alexander Bystritsky; Gerhard Hellemann; Susan Bookheimer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  Adding fear to conflict: a general purpose cognitive control network is modulated by trait anxiety.

Authors:  Marie K Krug; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Stress potentiates early and attenuates late stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Alexander J Shackman; Jeffrey S Maxwell; Brenton W McMenamin; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effects of aerobic exercise on sad emotion regulation in young women: an electroencephalograph study.

Authors:  Ren-Jen Hwang; Hsin-Ju Chen; Zhan-Xian Guo; Yu-Sheun Lee; Tai-Ying Liu
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Proactive and reactive control during emotional interference and its relationship to trait anxiety.

Authors:  Marie K Krug; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Dissociable neural effects of stimulus valence and preceding context during the inhibition of responses to emotional faces.

Authors:  Kurt P Schulz; Suzanne M Clerkin; Jeffrey M Halperin; Jeffrey H Newcorn; Cheuk Y Tang; Jin Fan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Guanfacine modulates the influence of emotional cues on prefrontal cortex activation for cognitive control.

Authors:  Kurt P Schulz; Suzanne M Clerkin; Jin Fan; Jeffrey M Halperin; Jeffrey H Newcorn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.