Literature DB >> 16197668

Low-dose cyclobenzaprine versus combination therapy with ibuprofen for acute neck or back pain with muscle spasm: a randomized trial.

Martin K Childers1, David Borenstein, Richard L Brown, Steven Gershon, Martin E Hale, Michelle Petri, George J Wan, Charles Laudadio, Diane D Harrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, community-based study was conducted to compare cyclobenzaprine 5 mg three times daily (TID) orally (CYC5) given for 7 days as monotherapy or in combination with ibuprofen 400 mg TID (CYC5/IBU400) or 800 mg TID (CYC5/IBU800) in adults with acute neck or back pain with muscle spasm. STUDY
DESIGN: Eligible patients were 18-65 years old, had cervical or thoracolumbar pain and spasm for < or = 14 days, and, aside from the prescribed study medications, discontinued treatment with all analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents, and skeletal muscle relaxants during the study period. Randomization was 1:1:1 to the three treatment groups. Treatment outcome was assessed after 3 and 7 days of therapy using five patient-rated scales: spasm, pain, patient global impression of change (PGIC), medication helpfulness, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
RESULTS: A total of 867 patients provided postbaseline data and were included in the intent-to-treat population (CYC5, n = 288; CYC5/IBU400, n = 286; CYC5/IBU800, n = 293). All three treatment groups demonstrated significant improvements from baseline in PGIC, spasm, pain, ODI, and medication helpfulness (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) after 3 and 7 days of therapy. There were no significant differences in mean PGIC among groups after 3 days of therapy (p = 0.65 for treatment effect) or after 7 days of therapy (primary endpoint; p = 0.41). A PGIC responder analysis of changes from baseline showed that 88% and 93% of patients reported at least mild improvement after 3 and 7 days of therapy, respectively. All three treatments were well tolerated, with no significant differences between treatments regarding the number of adverse events (AEs) reported or number of patients reporting AEs. The most common AEs in all groups were fatigue, somnolence, dizziness, sedation, and nausea. Limitations of this study include an unblinded design and possible introduction of bias into efficacy and safety results by use of a voluntary telephone reporting system.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, community-based clinical trial demonstrated that combination therapy with cyclobenzaprine 5 mg TID plus ibuprofen was not superior to cyclobenzaprine 5 mg TID alone in adult patients with acute neck and back pain with muscle spasm. All treatments were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197668     DOI: 10.1185/030079905X61938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cyclobenzaprine for acute back pain.

Authors:  Emélie Braschi; Scott Garrison; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Bioavailability of oral carisoprodol 250 and 350 mg and metabolism to meprobamate: A single-dose crossover study.

Authors:  Steve Simon; Carrie D'Andrea; William J Wheeler; Harry Sacks
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2010-02

3.  Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective.

Authors:  Benjamin W Friedman; Mikaela Chilstrom; Polly E Bijur; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial using a low-frequency magnetic field in the treatment of musculoskeletal chronic pain.

Authors:  Alex W Thomas; Karissa Graham; Frank S Prato; Julia McKay; Patricia Morley Forster; Dwight E Moulin; Sesh Chari
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 5.  Paracetamol for low back pain.

Authors:  Bruno T Saragiotto; Gustavo C Machado; Manuela L Ferreira; Marina B Pinheiro; Christina Abdel Shaheed; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-07

Review 6.  How to treat lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy? A systematic review on current standards.

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  PURLs: More isn't better with acute low back pain treatment.

Authors:  Kevin Frazer; James J Stevermer
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Pharmacological treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome: new developments.

Authors:  Roland Staud
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Physician-delivered injection therapies for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review update (non-oral, non-intravenous pharmacological interventions for neck pain).

Authors:  Anita R Gross; Paul M Peloso; Erin Galway; Neenah Navasero; Karis Van Essen; Nadine Graham; Charlie H Goldsmith; Wisam Gzeer; Qiyun Shi; Ted And Cog Haines
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-20

10.  Efficacy and safety of guaifenesin for upper back, neck, and shoulder pain: a Phase II proof-of-concept, multicenter, placebo-controlled, repeat-dose, parallel-group study.

Authors:  Agron Collaku; Yong Yue; Kenneth Reed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.133

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.