Literature DB >> 16197320

Examining the medical student body: peer physical exams and genital, rectal, or breast exams.

David V Power1, Bruce A Center.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some medical schools have replaced all student practice peer physical examinations in the curriculum with examinations of standardized patients (SPs).
PURPOSE: To assess attitudes of medical students toward practicing physical examinations with classmates, including genital, rectal, or female breast components.
METHODS: Survey administered to all 235 Year-4 students at University of Minnesota Medical School (69% response rate).
RESULTS: Ninety-five percent believed that limited peer practice exams are valuable. Six percent of students were uncomfortable with these exams: This was strongly associated with having had an uncomfortable experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Although most students value practicing limited exams with classmates, a small, consistent number of students are very uncomfortable with these. Explicit guidelines for faculty and classmate behavior may minimize their discomfort, but alternatives to peer exam, such as SP exams, need to be provided this small group. There is no role for peer genital, rectal, or female breast exams in the curriculum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197320     DOI: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1704_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  6 in total

1.  Effect of implementing instructional videos in a physical examination course: an alternative paradigm for chiropractic physical examination teaching.

Authors:  Niu Zhang; Sudeep Chawla
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2012

2.  Digital rectal examination skills: first training experiences, the motives and attitudes of standardized patients.

Authors:  Christoph Nikendei; Katja Diefenbacher; Nadja Köhl-Hackert; Heike Lauber; Julia Huber; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Wolfgang Herzog; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Jana Jünger; Markus Krautter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Perception of peer physical examination in two Australian osteopathy programs.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Sandra Grace
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-07-11

4.  A Trauma-Informed Approach to Peer Physical Examination.

Authors:  Sadie Elisseou; Emily Adams; Maya Adler
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2022-08-30

5.  New context, new content-Rethinking genital anatomy in textbooks.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hayes; Meredith J Temple-Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.652

6.  Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Fabrizio Consorti; Rosaria Mancuso; Annalisa Piccolo; Giacomo Consorti; Joseph Zurlo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.