Literature DB >> 16197270

Coordination of oral and laryngeal movements in the perceptually fluent speech of adults who stutter.

Ludo Max1, Vincent L Gracco.   

Abstract

This work investigated whether stuttering and nonstuttering adults differ in the coordination of oral and laryngeal movements during the production of perceptually fluent speech. This question was addressed by completing correlation analyses that extended previous acoustic studies by others as well as inferential analyses based on the within-subject central tendency and variability of acoustic and physiological indices of oral-laryngeal control and coordination. Stuttering and nonstuttering adults produced the target /p/ as the medial consonant in C(1)V(1)#C(2)V(2)C(3) sequences (C = consonant; V = vowel or diphthong; # = word boundary) embedded in utterances differing in length and location of the target movements. No between-groups differences were found for across- or within-subject correlations between acoustic measures of stop gap and voice onset time (VOT). However, the acoustic data did show longer durations for devoicing interval and VOT in the stuttering versus nonstuttering individuals, in the absence of a difference for a proportional measure specifically reflecting oral-laryngeal relative timing. Analyses of combined kinematic and electroglottographic data revealed that the stuttering individuals' speech was also characterized by (a) longer durations from bilabial closing movement onset and peak velocity to V(1) vocal fold vibration offset and (b) greater within-subject variability for dependent variables that were physiological indices of devoicing interval and VOT, but again no between-groups differences were found for specific indices of oral-laryngeal relative timing. Overall, findings suggest that, for the production of voiceless bilabial stops in perceptually fluent speech, stuttering and nonstuttering adults differ in the duration of intervals defined by events within as well as across the oral and laryngeal subsystems, but the groups show similar patterns of relative timing for the involved oral and laryngeal movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197270     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/036)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  18 in total

1.  Simultaneous electromagnetic articulography and electroglottography data acquisition of natural speech.

Authors:  Sarah Harper; Sungbok Lee; Louis Goldstein; Dani Byrd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evidence That Bimanual Motor Timing Performance Is Not a Significant Factor in Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Allison I Hilger; Howard Zelaznik; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Spectral Coefficient Analyses of Word-Initial Stop Consonant Productions Suggest Similar Anticipatory Coarticulation for Stuttering and Nonstuttering Adults.

Authors:  Santosh Maruthy; Yongqiang Feng; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Adults who stutter and metronome synchronization: evidence for a nonspeech timing deficit.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Evidence that a motor timing deficit is a factor in the development of stuttering.

Authors:  Lindsey Olander; Anne Smith; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  A Point of View About Fluency.

Authors:  Seth E Tichenor; Christopher Constantino; J Scott Yaruss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  Nonword repetition and nonword reading abilities in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  Afferent and efferent aspects of mandibular sensorimotor control in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Control and prediction components of movement planning in stuttering versus nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Acoustic analyses of diadochokinesis in fluent and stuttering children.

Authors:  Fabiola Staróbole Juste; Silmara Rondon; Fernanda Chiarion Sassi; Ana Paula Ritto; Claudia Aparecida Colalto; Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.