BACKGROUND: Lopinavir/ritonavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) that has shown great effectiveness as salvage therapy in PI-experienced HIV-infected children. OBJECTIVES: To study whether mutations in the HIV-1 protease gene can reliably predict virological responses to salvage therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective study in 56 HIV-infected children. PI-associated resistance mutations were determined by genotypic testing and were scored according to the IAS-USA guidelines 2005. RESULTS: Children with a 'lopinavir mutation score' (LMS) > or = 6 had a negative association for achieving viral load (VL) control [undetectable viral load (uVL) < or = 400 copies/mL] and maintaining uVL for at least 6 months. Moreover, children with protease-associated mutations (PRAMs) > or = 2 had a negative association for achieving VL control but not for maintaining uVL for at least 6 months. The relative proportion (RP) to uVL was 0.32 (CI95%: 0.16; 0.33; P = 0.002) in children with I54V (46% of total) and 0.48 (CI95%: 0.24; 0.97; P = 0.041) in children with V82A/F (52% of total). Children with I54V and V82A/F had higher prevalence of lopinavir-associated resistance mutations and showed RP of 0.36 (CI95%: 0.17; 0.76; P = 0.007) for achieving uVL. CONCLUSIONS: LMS and PRAMs in HIV-infected children were associated with virological failure in pre-treated HIV-infected children on salvage therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir. Moreover, I54V and V82A/F led to the poorest virological response.
BACKGROUND:Lopinavir/ritonavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) that has shown great effectiveness as salvage therapy in PI-experienced HIV-infectedchildren. OBJECTIVES: To study whether mutations in the HIV-1 protease gene can reliably predict virological responses to salvage therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infectedchildren. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective study in 56 HIV-infectedchildren. PI-associated resistance mutations were determined by genotypic testing and were scored according to the IAS-USA guidelines 2005. RESULTS:Children with a 'lopinavir mutation score' (LMS) > or = 6 had a negative association for achieving viral load (VL) control [undetectable viral load (uVL) < or = 400 copies/mL] and maintaining uVL for at least 6 months. Moreover, children with protease-associated mutations (PRAMs) > or = 2 had a negative association for achieving VL control but not for maintaining uVL for at least 6 months. The relative proportion (RP) to uVL was 0.32 (CI95%: 0.16; 0.33; P = 0.002) in children with I54V (46% of total) and 0.48 (CI95%: 0.24; 0.97; P = 0.041) in children with V82A/F (52% of total). Children with I54V and V82A/F had higher prevalence of lopinavir-associated resistance mutations and showed RP of 0.36 (CI95%: 0.17; 0.76; P = 0.007) for achieving uVL. CONCLUSIONS: LMS and PRAMs in HIV-infectedchildren were associated with virological failure in pre-treated HIV-infectedchildren on salvage therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir. Moreover, I54V and V82A/F led to the poorest virological response.
Authors: Richard A Murphy; Holly France; Henry Sunpath; Michelle L Gordon; Vincent C Marconi; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Kenneth McIntosh Journal: J Trop Pediatr Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 1.165
Authors: Jeffrey A Anderson; Hongyu Jiang; Xiao Ding; Leslie Petch; Terri Journigan; Susan A Fiscus; Richard Haubrich; David Katzenstein; Ronald Swanstrom; Roy M Gulick Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Salvador Resino; Rosa Resino; Juan A Leon; José M Bellon; Pablo Martin-Fontelos; Jose T Ramos; Dolores Gurbindo-Gutierrez; Maria I de Jose; Luis Ciria; Maria A Muñoz-Fernandez Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Theresa M Rossouw; Ute D Feucht; George Melikian; Gisela van Dyk; Winifred Thomas; Nicolette M du Plessis; Theunis Avenant Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240