Literature DB >> 16195070

Dynamic compression plates for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures: a 3-year follow-up of 18 cases.

Eleftherios Tsiridis1, Amir A Narvani, John A Timperley, Graham A Gie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the best surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. We report our experience with a dynamic compression plate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the results of 18 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the dynamic compression plate (DCP). There were 7 Vancouver type B1, 2 type B2 and 9 type B3 fractures. 16 cases had previously undergone at least one revision procedure. In addition to a DCP plate, all B2 and B3 fractures were revised to cemented prostheses, and all B3 fractures were revised with impaction grafting. Mean follow-up was 39 months.
RESULTS: The mean healing time for those 11 cases that united was 13 months. One B1-type and one B3-type fracture with plate fracture within 8 months of surgery failed to heal. Furthermore, one B1-type fracture and one B2-type fracture failed and developed nonunion. 3 patients died, from causes not related to surgery, within 8 months after surgery without signs of healing.
INTERPRETATION: Open reduction and internal fixation using DCPs seems to be a valid method for the treatment of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures with stable stem in place. If the stem is unstable, we suggest that DCPs may be used in association with femoral revision using a long stem. In cases with stable stem (B1), we are inclined to agree with other authors that additional fixation using an extramedullary cortical strut graft may be necessary to improve stability and promote final healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16195070     DOI: 10.1080/17453670510041529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  8 in total

1.  Treatment results of a periprosthetic femoral fracture case series: treatment method for Vancouver type b2 fractures can be customized.

Authors:  Takahiro Niikura; Sang Yang Lee; Yoshitada Sakai; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-05-16

Review 2.  [Ipsilateral THA after stemmed TKA: Risk of interprosthetic fracture?].

Authors:  J Dexel; A Hartmann; J Pyrc; K-P Günther; J Lützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients.

Authors:  Cibu Mukundan; Faizal Rayan; Ehab Kheir; D Macdonald
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Andrew N Fleischman; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

6.  Feasibility of the Inner-Side-Out Use of the LC-DCP for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Heejae Won; Jun-Young Kim; Seung-Hoon Baek; Wonki Hong; Jee-Wook Yoon; Shin-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 7.  Post-operative peri-prosthetic fracture rates following the use of cemented polished taper-slip stems for primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kwaku Baryeh; David H Sochart
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  A methodology for the generation and non-destructive characterisation of transverse fractures in long bones.

Authors:  Fernando Y Zapata-Cornelio; Zhongmin Jin; David C Barton; Alison C Jones; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2018-04-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.