Literature DB >> 16194981

Effects of load on ground reaction force and lower limb kinematics during concentric squats.

Eleftherios Kellis1, Fotini Arambatzi, Christos Papadopoulos.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of external load on vertical ground reaction force, and linear and angular kinematics, during squats. Eight males aged 22.1 +/- 0.8 years performed maximal concentric squats using loads ranging from 7 to 70% of one-repetition maximum on a force plate while linear barbell velocity and the angular kinematics of the hip, knee and ankle were recorded. Maximum, average and angle-specific values were recorded. The ground reaction force ranged from 1.67 +/- 0.20 to 3.21 +/- 0.29 times body weight and increased significantly as external load increased (P < 0.05). Bar linear velocity ranged from 0.54 +/- 0.11 to 2.50 +/- 0.50 m x s(-1) and decreased significantly with increasing external load (P < 0.05). Hip, knee and ankle angles at maximum ground reaction force were affected by external load (P < 0.05). The force-barbell velocity curves were fitted using linear models with coefficients (r2) ranging from 0.59 to 0.96. The results suggest that maximal force exertion during squat exercises is not achieved at the same position of the lower body as external load is increased. In contrast, joint velocity coordination does not change as load is increased. The force-velocity relationship was linear and independent from the set of data used for its determination.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194981     DOI: 10.1080/02640410400022094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  MODIFIED FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREENING AS A PREDICTOR OF TACTICAL PERFORMANCE POTENTIAL IN RECREATIONALLY ACTIVE ADULTS.

Authors:  Stephen M Glass; Scott E Ross
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10

2.  Power output in vertical jumps: does optimum loading depend on activity profiles?

Authors:  Nemanja Pazin; Bobana Berjan; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Goran Markovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of load on good morning kinematics and EMG activity.

Authors:  Andrew David Vigotsky; Erin Nicole Harper; David Russell Ryan; Bret Contreras
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Two-Segment Foot Model for the Biomechanical Analysis of Squat.

Authors:  E Panero; L Gastaldi; W Rapp
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  The Reliability and Validity of Current Technologies for Measuring Barbell Velocity in the Free-Weight Back Squat and Power Clean.

Authors:  Steve W Thompson; David Rogerson; Harry F Dorrell; Alan Ruddock; Andrew Barnes
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Comparison of Peak Ground Reaction Force, Joint Kinetics and Kinematics, and Muscle Activity Between a Flexible and Steel Barbell During the Back Squat Exercise.

Authors:  Randolph E Hutchison; Anthony Caterisano
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat.

Authors:  Berkant Erman; Mehmet Zeki Ozkol; Jelena Ivanović; Hakan Arslan; Marko Ćosić; Yasin Yuzbasioglu; Milivoj Dopsaj; Tolga Aksit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.