Literature DB >> 16194978

Season of birth distribution of elite tennis players.

Susan Edgar1, Peter O'Donoghue.   

Abstract

In many competitive sports, the use of a cut-off date for junior competition has been associated with a skewed birth date distribution in junior and senior players. The International Tennis Federation uses a junior competition year that commences on 1 January. The purpose of the current investigation was to describe the birth date distribution of 448 elite senior tennis players and 476 elite junior tennis players. There was a significant season of birth bias among elite senior players (P < 0.001), with 58.9% being born in the first 6 months of the year. There was also a significant season of birth bias among elite junior players (P < 0.001), with 59.5% being born in the first 6 months of the year. This pattern was observed in both male and female players as well as in players from different regions. The results provide evidence that it is the cut-off date for the junior competition year that is responsible for the skewed birth date distribution in tennis rather than regional or climatic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194978     DOI: 10.1080/02640410400021468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  18 in total

1.  No evidence for the relative age effect in professional women's sports.

Authors:  Nadav Goldschmied
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Relative Age Effect and Physical Fitness Characteristics in German Male Tennis Players.

Authors:  Alexander Ulbricht; Jaime Fernandez-Fernandez; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva; Alexander Ferrauti
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Annual age-grouping and athlete development: a meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport.

Authors:  Stephen Cobley; Joseph Baker; Nick Wattie; Jim McKenna
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The relative age effect and the influence on performance in youth alpine ski racing.

Authors:  Lisa Müller; Carolin Hildebrandt; Christian Raschner
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  The Relative Age Effect in the 10 Best Leagues of Male Professional Football of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA).

Authors:  José M Yagüe; Alfonso de la Rubia; Joaquín Sánchez-Molina; Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo; Olga Molinero
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Relative Age Effects Across and Within Female Sport Contexts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kristy L Smith; Patricia L Weir; Kevin Till; Michael Romann; Stephen Cobley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Relative age effects in athletic sprinting and corrective adjustments as a solution for their removal.

Authors:  Michael Romann; Stephen Cobley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does Relative Age Affect Career Length in North American Professional Sports?

Authors:  C Steingröver; N Wattie; J Baker; J Schorer
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2016-01-15

9.  Relationship Between the Relative Age Effect and Lengths of Professional Careers in Male Japanese Baseball Players: a Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-06-02

Review 10.  Soccer and Relative Age Effect: A Walk among Elite Players and Young Players.

Authors:  Manuel Jacob Sierra-Díaz; Sixto González-Víllora; Juan Carlos Pastor-Vicedo; Jaime Serra-Olivares
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.