Literature DB >> 16194957

The preparation of reach-to-grasp movements in adults, children, and children with movement problems.

M Mon-Williams1, J R Tresilian, V E Bell, V L Coppard, M Nixdorf, R G Carson.   

Abstract

This study explored the use of advance information in the control of reach-to-grasp movements. The paradigm required participants to reach and grasp illuminated blocks with their right hand. Four target blocks were positioned on a table surface, two each side of the mid-saggital plane. In the complete precue condition, advance information precisely specified target location. In the partial precue condition, advance information indicated target location relative to the midsaggital plane (left or right). In the null condition, the advance information was entirely ambiguous. Participants produced fastest responses in the complete precue condition, intermediate response times in the partial condition, and the slowest responses in the null condition. This result was observed in adults and four groups of children including a group aged 4-6 years. In contrast, children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD, n=11, aged 7--13 years) showed no advantage of partial precueing. Movement duration was determined by target location but was unaffected by precue condition. Movement duration was a clear function of age apart from children in the DCD group who showed equivalent movement times to those of the youngest children. These findings provide important insights into the control of reach-to-grasp movements and highlight that partial cues are exploited by children as young as 4 years but are not used in situations of abnormal development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194957     DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  7 in total

1.  When an object appears unexpectedly: anticipatory movement and object circumvention in individuals with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Authors:  K Wilmut; A L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The use of predictive information is impaired in the actions of children and young adults with Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; John Wann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Children and older adults exhibit distinct sub-optimal cost-benefit functions when preparing to move their eyes and hands.

Authors:  Claudia C Gonzalez; Mark Mon-Williams; Melanie R Burke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How do i fit through that gap? Navigation through apertures in adults with and without developmental coordination disorder.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Wenchong Du; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Online Control of Prehension Predicts Performance on a Standardized Motor Assessment Test in 8- to 12-Year-Old Children.

Authors:  Caroline C V Blanchard; Hannah L McGlashan; Blandine French; Rachel J Sperring; Bianca Petrocochino; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-16

6.  Is auditory perceptual timing a core deficit of developmental coordination disorder?

Authors:  Laurel J Trainor; Andrew Chang; John Cairney; Yao-Chuen Li
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Unimanual and bimanual motor performance in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) provide evidence for underlying motor control deficits.

Authors:  Melody N Grohs; Rachel L Hawe; Sean P Dukelow; Deborah Dewey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.