Literature DB >> 16194703

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor.

Mihir M Desai1, Monish Aron, Inderbir S Gill.   

Abstract

We sought to compare perioperative and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation in patients with peripheral small renal tumors. Prospectively accrued data of patients with a small renal tumor (< or = 3 cm) undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (group 1, n = 153) or laparoscopic cryoablation (group 2, n = 78) were compared retrospectively. Patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were younger (mean age, 60.6 vs 65.6 years; P = 0.005), healthier (American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3/4 present in 46% vs 75%; P = 0.001), had a lower baseline serum creatinine (90.1 vs 106.0 micromol/L [1.02 vs 1.2 mg/dL]; P = 0.01), a larger tumor size (2.3 vs 2.1 cm; P = 0.02), and fewer cases of solitary kidneys (5% vs 23%; P = 0.000). Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with greater blood loss (211 vs 101 mL; P = 0.000) and a higher incidence of delayed complications after hospital discharge (16.3% vs 2.2%; P = 0.01) compared with cryoablation. Both groups were comparable with regard to operative time (P = 0.77), intraoperative complications (P = 0.1), postoperative complications (P = 0.55), hospital stay (P = 0.13), convalescence (P = 0.96), and postoperative serum creatinine (112.2 vs 123.7 micromol/L [1.27 vs 1.4 mg/dL]; P = 0.31). Local recurrence was detected over a mean follow-up time of 5.8 months in group 1 (0.6%) and 24.6 months in group 2 (3%). Although the technical simplicity, decreased blood loss, and somewhat lower complication rate are attractive features of renal cryotherapy, this must be balanced against the current lack of long-term follow-up data that are needed to confirm the oncologic adequacy of this developmental procedure. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, albeit a technically advanced procedure, duplicates established open principles and has therefore evolved to become our current minimally invasive nephron-sparing procedure of choice in the majority of patients with a small renal tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194703     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  28 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided percutaneous ablation of renal tumors: outcomes, technique, and application in urologic practice.

Authors:  Adam C Mues; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Results of kidney tumor cryoablation: renal function preservation and oncologic efficacy.

Authors:  Adam C Mues; Jaime Landman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Renal function and oncologic outcomes after cryoablation or partial nephrectomy for tumors in solitary kidneys.

Authors:  Jatinder Goyal; Abhinav Sidana; Christos S Georgiades; Ronald Rodriguez
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-06-17

Review 4.  Laparoscopic renal cryoablation.

Authors:  Marc Schiffman; Amiel Moshfegh; Adam Talenfeld; Joseph J Del Pizzo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Ablative Therapies for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: a Review of Different Modalities and Outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas Kavoussi; Noah Canvasser; Jeffrey Caddedu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Focal ablation therapy for renal cancer in the era of active surveillance and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Renal Functional Outcomes after Surgery, Ablation, and Active Surveillance of Localized Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Mohamad E Allaf; Eric B Bass; Stephen M Sozio
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation.

Authors:  Byeong Kuk Ham; Sung Gu Kang; Hoon Choi; Young Hwii Ko; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

9.  Comparison of prolonged warm and cold ischemia on the solitary kidney during partial nephrectomy in a rabbit model.

Authors:  S I Tyritzis; A Kyroudi; E Liatsikos; T Manousakas; P Karayannacos; N Kostomitsopoulos; A Zervas; K Pavlakis; J-U Stolzenburg; C Constantinides
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Current status of ablative therapies for renal tumors.

Authors:  Adam C Mues; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.