Literature DB >> 16194177

Swedish women's satisfaction with medical and emotional aspects of antenatal care.

Ingegerd Hildingsson1, Ingela Rådestad.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper reports a study to investigate how satisfied Swedish women are with their antenatal care.
BACKGROUND: Medical care is of high priority, but other aspects, such as psychosocial support are also important for women during pregnancy. Identifying women who are dissatisfied with their antenatal care could help us to improve this. Methods. A national cohort of 2746 Swedish-speaking women completed a questionnaire in early pregnancy and at 2 months postpartum. The data were collected in 1999-2000.
RESULTS: The majority of participants were satisfied with their antenatal care, but 23% were dissatisfied with the emotional aspects and 18% with the medical aspects. The strongest predictors of dissatisfaction were women's opinions that midwives had not been supportive and had not paid attention to their partners' needs. If the women believed that there were not enough antenatal visits or had met three or more midwives during their antenatal visits, they were more likely to be dissatisfied with the care received. Those with low levels of education were more likely to be dissatisfied with both medical and emotional aspects of antenatal care.
CONCLUSIONS: Midwives working in antenatal care should support pregnant women and their partners in a professional and friendly way in order to increase satisfaction with care. Organizing teamwork with no more than two midwives taking care of a woman during a normal pregnancy could make women feel more supported by their midwives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194177     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03584.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  26 in total

1.  Prenatal parental education from the perspective of fathers with experience as primary caregiver immediately following birth: a phenomenographic study.

Authors:  Kerstin Erlandsson; Elisabet Häggström-Nordin
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

2.  An evaluation of male partners' perceptions of antenatal classes in a national health service hospital: implications for service provision in london.

Authors:  Nessie Shia; Oluseyi Alabi
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

4.  Engagement: an indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Authors:  Angie Docherty; Carol Bugge; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Satisfaction among Expectant Mothers with Antenatal Care Services in the Musandam Region of Oman.

Authors:  Mohammed Ghobashi; Rajiv Khandekar
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2008-11

6.  Trust and ambivalence in midwives' views towards women developing pelvic pain during pregnancy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ingrid Mogren; Anna Winkvist; Lars Dahlgren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  National survey of obstetrician attitudes about timing the subsequent pregnancy after perinatal death.

Authors:  Katherine J Gold; Irving Leon; Mark C Chames
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Why Are Half of Women Interested in Participating in Group Prenatal Care?

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Wendy Sword; Leyla N Eryuzlu; Binod Neupane; Joseph Beyene; Anne B Biringer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-01

9.  Fathers' lived experiences of getting to know their baby while acting as primary caregivers immediately following birth.

Authors:  Kerstin Erlandsson; Kyllike Christensson; Ingegerd Fagerberg
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2008

10.  A survey on worries of pregnant women--testing the German version of the Cambridge worry scale.

Authors:  Juliana J Petersen; Michael A Paulitsch; Corina Guethlin; Jochen Gensichen; Albrecht Jahn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.