OBJECTIVES: We designed this study to examine the characteristics of coronary circulation in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM) using noninvasive transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE). BACKGROUND: Recent advances in TTDE have allowed noninvasive assessment of coronary circulation by the measurement of coronary flow velocity (CFV) patterns and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). However, there have been no previous studies evaluating coronary circulation in ApHCM. METHODS: We analyzed CFV and CFVR in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and apical wall thickness in the left ventricle, in 10 ApHCM subjects and 10 control subjects. Mean diastolic velocity (MDV) and time from the beginning of diastole to peak velocity (TPV), and CFVR, defined as a ratio of drug-induced hyperemic to basal MDV, were measured. RESULTS: At baseline, MDV was higher, and TPV was longer, in ApHCM subjects than in control subjects (29 +/- 5.7 versus 19 +/- 6.5 cm/sec; p < 0.01 and 5.2 +/- 1.0 versus 3.5 +/- 0.6 msec; p < 0.005, respectively). CFVR in ApHCM subjects was significantly lower than in control subjects (1.9 +/- 0.4 versus 3.1 +/- 0.8; p < 0.005). CFVR and basal MDV in ApHCM subjects showed significant correlations with apical/posterior wall thickness ratio [CFVR; r =-0.84, p < 0.01 and MDV; r = 0.74, p < 0.05, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive coronary flow assessment by TTDE revealed an impaired coronary circulation with reduced CFVR, high MDV at baseline and prolonged TPV. These results suggest that these characteristics of coronary circulation may provide an additional index for the assessment of ApHCM.
OBJECTIVES: We designed this study to examine the characteristics of coronary circulation in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM) using noninvasive transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE). BACKGROUND: Recent advances in TTDE have allowed noninvasive assessment of coronary circulation by the measurement of coronary flow velocity (CFV) patterns and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). However, there have been no previous studies evaluating coronary circulation in ApHCM. METHODS: We analyzed CFV and CFVR in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and apical wall thickness in the left ventricle, in 10 ApHCM subjects and 10 control subjects. Mean diastolic velocity (MDV) and time from the beginning of diastole to peak velocity (TPV), and CFVR, defined as a ratio of drug-induced hyperemic to basal MDV, were measured. RESULTS: At baseline, MDV was higher, and TPV was longer, in ApHCM subjects than in control subjects (29 +/- 5.7 versus 19 +/- 6.5 cm/sec; p < 0.01 and 5.2 +/- 1.0 versus 3.5 +/- 0.6 msec; p < 0.005, respectively). CFVR in ApHCM subjects was significantly lower than in control subjects (1.9 +/- 0.4 versus 3.1 +/- 0.8; p < 0.005). CFVR and basal MDV in ApHCM subjects showed significant correlations with apical/posterior wall thickness ratio [CFVR; r =-0.84, p < 0.01 and MDV; r = 0.74, p < 0.05, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive coronary flow assessment by TTDE revealed an impaired coronary circulation with reduced CFVR, high MDV at baseline and prolonged TPV. These results suggest that these characteristics of coronary circulation may provide an additional index for the assessment of ApHCM.
Authors: Attila Nemes; Erika Balázs; Osama I I Soliman; Róbert Sepp; Miklós Csanády; Tamás Forster Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2009-09-27 Impact factor: 2.037