Literature DB >> 16193359

Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail.

Koji Watanabe1, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya, Keisuke Sakurakichi, Norio Yamamoto, Tamon Kabata, Katsuro Tomita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term application of an external fixator to treat leg-length discrepancy and short stature often causes complications, such as pin-tract infection or loss of range of motion at the knee or ankle (or both). Prolonged fixator use also interferes with the activities of daily living. To minimize such problems, we have combined intramedullary nailing with external fixation. Using this technique, the external fixator can be removed more quickly after completing the lengthening.
METHODS: We combined intramedullary nailing with lengthening in 13 tibias (8 patients) and then compared these cases with 17 standard tibial lengthenings (16 patients) using an external fixator alone. In both groups we excluded patients who had a history of previous bone infection, open fracture, immature bone, soft tissue compromise, antineoplastic chemotherapy, or bone deformity of a severity that required gradual deformity correction. We also excluded cases with lengthening of less than 3 cm.
RESULTS: The mean external fixation index differed significantly between the two groups, but the consolidation index did not. Mean operating time for lengthening combined with intramedullary nail placement was approximately 60 min longer than for standard lengthening without nail placement; intraoperative blood loss was not greater in the nailing group. Complications related to the external fixator were far fewer in the combined intramedullary nailing and lengthening group compared with the control group, and callus formation was satisfactory for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of intramedullary nailing and external fixation produces callus formation as good as that obtained by the standard Ilizarov method of lengthening. Furthermore, this combined procedure decreases the external fixation time and is associated with fewer complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16193359     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-005-0939-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  15 in total

1.  Tibial lengthening over humeral and tibial intramedullary nails in patients with sequelae of poliomyelitis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Daoyun Chen; Jianmin Chen; Yao Jiang; Fanggang Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of 39 post-traumatic tibia bone transports performed with and without the use of an intramedullary rod: the long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Ulrich Wiebking; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  S-osteotomy with lengthening and then nailing compared with traditional Ilizarov method.

Authors:  Xia Lan; Lihai Zhang; Peifu Tang; Hetao Xia; Gang Li; Aiming Peng; Yilian Han; Bangtuo Yuan; Wenpeng Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Dawn Kleinman; Austin T Fragomen; Svetlana Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Tibial lengthening using a reamed type intramedullary nail and an Ilizarov external fixator.

Authors:  Hayoung Kim; Sang Ki Lee; Kap Jung Kim; Jae Hoon Ahn; Won Sik Choy; Yong In Kim; Jea Yun Koo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail in patients with short stature or leg-length discrepancy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Qianchen Guo; Tao Zhang; Yongfa Zheng; Shiqing Feng; Xinlong Ma; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Does Integrated Fixation Provide Benefit in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Tibial Bone Defects?

Authors:  Mitchell Bernstein; Austin T Fragomen; Samir Sabharwal; Jonathan Barclay; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Reamed Intramedullary Nailing has an Adverse Effect on Bone Regeneration During the Distraction Phase in Tibial Lengthening.

Authors:  Keun Jung Ryu; Bang Hyun Kim; Jin Ho Hwang; Hyun Woo Kim; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Is there an Increase in Valgus Deviation in Tibial Distraction Using the Lengthening Over Nail Technique?

Authors:  Hoon Park; Keun Jung Ryu; Hyun Woo Kim; Jin Ho Hwang; Joon Woo Han; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does the use of an intramedullary nail alter the duration of external fixation and rate of consolidation in tibial lengthening procedures? A systematic review.

Authors:  S Jain; P Harwood
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2012-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.