R Gao1, J Ustinov, O Korsgren, T Otonkoski. 1. Program of Developmental and Reproductive Biology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Finland. ru.gao@helsinki.fi
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The neogenesis of islets from cultured human adult pancreatic tissue has been reported. The islet progenitors have been thought to be ductal cells. Since previous experiments have been 'contaminated' by a number of pre-existing islet cells, we examined their involvement in islet cell neogenesis. METHODS: Fresh human pancreatic cells with different purities of islet cells were grown in monolayer culture and labelled with bromodeoxyuridine. Transitional cells were analysed by double immunofluorescence staining. For purified ductal cell culture, pre-existing islets were eliminated on a magnetic cell separation system. RESULTS: We confirmed that less than 1% of the endocrine cells proliferated, mainly during the first 48 h of culture. However, a 10-fold larger proportion of the cells acquired a transitional phenotype by starting to coexpress the ductal marker cytokeratin 19 (CK19). These cells represented more than 10% of all endocrine cells after 1 day in culture, and 6% at 5 days of culture. Using magnetic cell sorting, we eliminated cells expressing neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM), after which we obtained 99.7% pure non-endocrine CK19-rich cell populations. These cell populations could be expanded in vitro. However, their endocrine differentiation capacity was severely reduced as compared with the original mixed cell cultures. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that islet neogenesis in this culture system at least partly represents the de-differentiation of islet cells into a duct-cell-like phenotype, with further re-differentiation in appropriate conditions. The plasticity of differentiated human pancreatic cell types may thus be an important mechanism of human pancreas regeneration.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The neogenesis of islets from cultured human adult pancreatic tissue has been reported. The islet progenitors have been thought to be ductal cells. Since previous experiments have been 'contaminated' by a number of pre-existing islet cells, we examined their involvement in islet cell neogenesis. METHODS: Fresh humanpancreatic cells with different purities of islet cells were grown in monolayer culture and labelled with bromodeoxyuridine. Transitional cells were analysed by double immunofluorescence staining. For purified ductal cell culture, pre-existing islets were eliminated on a magnetic cell separation system. RESULTS: We confirmed that less than 1% of the endocrine cells proliferated, mainly during the first 48 h of culture. However, a 10-fold larger proportion of the cells acquired a transitional phenotype by starting to coexpress the ductal marker cytokeratin 19 (CK19). These cells represented more than 10% of all endocrine cells after 1 day in culture, and 6% at 5 days of culture. Using magnetic cell sorting, we eliminated cells expressing neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM), after which we obtained 99.7% pure non-endocrine CK19-rich cell populations. These cell populations could be expanded in vitro. However, their endocrine differentiation capacity was severely reduced as compared with the original mixed cell cultures. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that islet neogenesis in this culture system at least partly represents the de-differentiation of islet cells into a duct-cell-like phenotype, with further re-differentiation in appropriate conditions. The plasticity of differentiated humanpancreatic cell types may thus be an important mechanism of human pancreas regeneration.
Authors: Wilma L Suarez-Pinzon; Jonathan R T Lakey; Stephen J Brand; Alex Rabinovitch Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S Bonner-Weir; M Taneja; G C Weir; K Tatarkiewicz; K H Song; A Sharma; J J O'Neil Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-07-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephen T Bartlett; James F Markmann; Paul Johnson; Olle Korsgren; Bernhard J Hering; David Scharp; Thomas W H Kay; Jonathan Bromberg; Jon S Odorico; Gordon C Weir; Nancy Bridges; Raja Kandaswamy; Peter Stock; Peter Friend; Mitsukazu Gotoh; David K C Cooper; Chung-Gyu Park; Phillip OʼConnell; Cherie Stabler; Shinichi Matsumoto; Barbara Ludwig; Pratik Choudhary; Boris Kovatchev; Michael R Rickels; Megan Sykes; Kathryn Wood; Kristy Kraemer; Albert Hwa; Edward Stanley; Camillo Ricordi; Mark Zimmerman; Julia Greenstein; Eduard Montanya; Timo Otonkoski Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Olivia G Kelly; Man Yin Chan; Laura A Martinson; Kuniko Kadoya; Traci M Ostertag; Kelly G Ross; Mike Richardson; Melissa K Carpenter; Kevin A D'Amour; Evert Kroon; Mark Moorman; Emmanuel E Baetge; Anne G Bang Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2011-07-31 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Liang Jin; Tao Feng; Hung Ping Shih; Ricardo Zerda; Angela Luo; Jasper Hsu; Alborz Mahdavi; Maike Sander; David A Tirrell; Arthur D Riggs; Hsun Teresa Ku Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 11.205