Literature DB >> 16192711

Somatic chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men and women.

U A Mau-Holzmann1.   

Abstract

Infertility--the inability to achieve conception or sustain a pregnancy through to live birth--is very common and affects about 15% of couples. While chromosomal or genetic abnormalities associated with azoospermia, severe oligozoospermia or primary ovarian failure were of no importance for reproduction prior to the era of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), advances in assisted reproductive techniques (ART) now enable many infertile couples to have children. These developments have raised the question of the genetic consequences of ICSI: concerns of the potential harm of the invasive procedure and concerns about the genetic risk. The infertile male and female definitely have an increased risk to carry a chromosomal abnormality. Detection of such an abnormality is of fundamental importance for the diagnosis of infertility, the following treatment, the evaluation of the risk for the future child and the appropriate management of the pregnancy to be obtained. Therefore, cytogenetic screening of both partners is mandatory prior to any type of ART. The present review is based on several surveys on male and female infertility and analyzes the types and frequencies of the different reported chromosome abnormalities according to the type of impairment of spermatogenesis and the type of treatment planned or performed. With regard to assisted reproductive techniques (especially ICSI) the main types of chromosomal abnormalities are discussed and their potential risks for ICSI. If available, reported cases of performed ICSI and its outcome are presented. The detection of an abnormal karyotype should lead to comprehensive genetic counselling, which should include all well-known information about the individual type of anomaly, its clinical relevance, its possible inheritance, the genetic risk of unbalanced offspring, and the possibilities of prenatal diagnosis. Only this proceeding allows at-risk couples to make an informed decision regarding whether or not to proceed with ART. These decisions can be made only when both partners have clearly understood the genetic risks and possible consequences when ART is used. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192711     DOI: 10.1159/000086906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  27 in total

1.  Somatic chromosomal abnormalities in couples undergoing infertility treatment by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Bernd Rosenbusch
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Sequential FISH allows the determination of the segregation outcome and the presence of numerical anomalies in spermatozoa from a t(1;8;2)(q42;p21;p15) carrier.

Authors:  Anna Godo; Joan Blanco; Francesca Vidal; Mònica Parriego; Montserrat Boada; Ester Anton
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Altered bivalent positioning in metaphase I human spermatocytes from Robertsonian translocation carriers.

Authors:  Mireia Solé; Joan Blanco; Oliver Valero; Laia Vergés; Francesca Vidal; Zaida Sarrate
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Male infertility associated with de novo pericentric inversion of chromosome 1.

Authors:  Özgür Balasar; Ayşe Gül Zamani; Mehmet Balasar; Hasan Acar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Case - Severely oligozoospermic patient with both mosaic Klinefelter syndrome and a complete azoospermia factor c (AZFc) Y chromosome microdeletion.

Authors:  Andrew P Golin; Sarah Neil; Ryan Flannigan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Cytoskeletal alterations associated with donor age and culture interval for equine oocytes and potential zygotes that failed to cleave after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Elena Ruggeri; Keith F DeLuca; Cesare Galli; Giovanna Lazzari; Jennifer G DeLuca; Elaine M Carnevale
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Karyotype analysis in large-sample infertile couples living in Central China: a study of 14965 couples.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Xiang-dong Kong; Qing-hua Wu; Gang Li; Lin Song; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Genetics of Male Infertility.

Authors:  Filipe Tenorio Lira Neto; Phil Vu Bach; Bobby Baback Najari; Philip Shihua Li; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) and male infertility: characterization of five new cases, review of the literature, and perspectives.

Authors:  Wafa Slimani; Afef Jelloul; Ahmed Al-Rikabi; Amira Sallem; Yosra Hasni; Salma Chachia; Adel Ernez; Anouar Chaieb; Mohamed Bibi; Thomas Liehr; Ali Saad; Soumaya Mougou-Zerelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  De novo complex intra chromosomal rearrangement after ICSI: characterisation by BACs micro array-CGH.

Authors:  Serdar Kasakyan; Laurence Lohmann; Azeddine Aboura; Mazin Quimsiyeh; Yves Menezo; Gerard Tachdjian; Moncef Benkhalifa
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.