Literature DB >> 16192543

Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters.

Andrea Casati1, Guido Fanelli, Zbigniew Koscielniak-Nielsen, Gianluca Cappelleri, Giorgio Aldegheri, Giorgio Danelli, Régis Fuzier, François Singelyn.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We prospectively tested the hypothesis that the use of a stimulating catheter improves the efficacy of continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block in 100 randomized patients scheduled for elective orthopedic foot surgery. After eliciting a sciatic mediated muscular twitch at < or = 0.5 mA nerve stimulation output, the perineural catheter was advanced 2-4 cm beyond the tip of the introducer either blindly (Group C; n = 50) or stimulating via the catheter (Group S; n = 50). A bolus dose of 25 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine was followed by a postoperative patient-controlled infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (basal infusion: 3 mL/h; incremental dose: 5 mL; lockout time: 30 min). Propacetamol 2 g IV was administered every 8 h, and opioid rescue analgesia was available if required. Catheter placement required 7 +/- 2 min in Group S and 5 +/- 2 min in Group C (P = 0.056). A significantly shorter onset time of both sensory and motor blocks was noted in Group S. No difference in quality of pain relief at rest and during motion was reported between the groups. Median (range) local anesthetic consumption during the first 48 h after surgery was 239 mL (175-519 mL) and 322 mL (184-508 mL) in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). Rescue opioid analgesia was required by 12 (25%) and 28 (58%) patients in Groups S and C, respectively (P = 0.002). We conclude that the use of a stimulating catheter results in shorter onset time of posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block, similar pain relief with reduced postoperative consumption of local anesthetic solution, and less rescue opioid consumption. IMPLICATIONS: This prospective, randomized, blind investigation demonstrated that the use of a stimulating catheter for continuous posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block resulted in shorter onset time of sensory and motor blocks and less local anesthetic consumption and need for rescue pain medication after elective orthopedic foot surgery compared with blind catheter advancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192543     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000167232.10305.cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Electrical nerve stimulation for plexus and nerve blocks].

Authors:  J Birnbaum; E Klotz; G Bogusch; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Continuous femoral versus posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Edward R Mariano; Sarah J Madison; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Preetham J Suresh; Michael L Bishop; T Edward Kim; Michael C Donohue; Anna A Kulidjian; Scott T Ball
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Edward R Mariano; Vanessa J Loland; NavParkash S Sandhu; Michael L Bishop; Daniel K Lee; Alexandra K Schwartz; Paul J Girard; Eliza J Ferguson; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  The effects of varying local anesthetic concentration and volume on continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Vanessa J Loland; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  [Pain therapy using stimulating catheters after total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  P Fritze; S Anderl; A Marouf; R Cumlivski; Ch Müller; E Pernicka; G Redl
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  No correlation between minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block catheter for brachial plexus block: a prospective blinded cohort study.

Authors:  Karin Pw Schoenmakers; Petra Jc Heesterbeek; Nigel Tm Jack; Rudolf Stienstra
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.