Literature DB >> 16192208

Lying to insurance companies: the desire to deceive among physicians and the public.

Rachel M Werner1, G Caleb Alexander, Angela Fagerlin, Peter A Ubel.   

Abstract

This study examines the public's and physicians' willingness to support deception of insurance companies in order to obtain necessary healthcare services and how this support varies based on perceptions of physicians' time pressures. Based on surveys of 700 prospective jurors and 1617 physicians, the public was more than twice as likely as physicians to sanction deception (26%versus 11%) and half as likely to believe that physicians have adequate time to appeal coverage decisions (22%versus 59%). The odds of public support for deception compared to that of physicians rose from 2.48 to 4.64 after controlling for differences in time perception. These findings highlight the ethical challenge facing physicians and patients in balancing patient advocacy with honesty in the setting of limited societal resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16192208     DOI: 10.1080/15265160490518566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  2 in total

Review 1.  No evidence of the effect of the interventions to combat health care fraud and abuse: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Arash Rashidian; Hossein Joudaki; Taryn Vian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Are surgeons and anesthesiologists lying to each other or gaming the system? A national random sample survey about "truth-telling practices" in the perioperative setting in the United States.

Authors:  Michael Nurok; Yuo-Yu Lee; Yan Ma; Anthony Kirwan; Matthew Wynia; Scott Segal
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-11-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.