Literature DB >> 16191624

Behavioural manipulation in a grasshopper harbouring hairworm: a proteomics approach.

D G Biron1, L Marché, F Ponton, H D Loxdale, N Galéotti, L Renault, C Joly, F Thomas.   

Abstract

The parasitic Nematomorph hairworm, Spinochordodes tellinii (Camerano) develops inside the terrestrial grasshopper, Meconema thalassinum (De Geer) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), changing the insect's responses to water. The resulting aberrant behaviour makes infected insects more likely to jump into an aquatic environment where the adult parasite reproduces. We used proteomics tools (i.e. two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), computer assisted comparative analysis of host and parasite protein spots and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry) to identify these proteins and to explore the mechanisms underlying this subtle behavioural modification. We characterized simultaneously the host (brain) and the parasite proteomes at three stages of the manipulative process, i.e. before, during and after manipulation. For the host, there was a differential proteomic expression in relation to different effects such as the circadian cycle, the parasitic status, the manipulative period itself, and worm emergence. For the parasite, a differential proteomics expression allowed characterization of the parasitic and the free-living stages, the manipulative period and the emergence of the worm from the host. The findings suggest that the adult worm alters the normal functions of the grasshopper's central nervous system (CNS) by producing certain 'effective' molecules. In addition, in the brain of manipulated insects, there was found to be a differential expression of proteins specifically linked to neurotransmitter activities. The evidence obtained also suggested that the parasite produces molecules from the family Wnt acting directly on the development of the CNS. These proteins show important similarities with those known in other insects, suggesting a case of molecular mimicry. Finally, we found many proteins in the host's CNS as well as in the parasite for which the function(s) are still unknown in the published literature (www) protein databases. These results support the hypothesis that host behavioural changes are mediated by a mix of direct and indirect chemical manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16191624      PMCID: PMC1559948          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  34 in total

Review 1.  Molecular crosstalk in host-parasite relationships: schistosome- and leech-host interactions.

Authors:  M Salzet; A Capron; G B Stefano
Journal:  Parasitol Today       Date:  2000-12

2.  Evaluation of parameters in peptide mass fingerprinting for protein identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kyunghee Lee; Dongwon Bae; Dongbin Lim
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 3.  Understanding parasite strategies: a state-dependent approach?

Authors:  Frédéric Thomas; Sam P Brown; Michael Sukhdeo; François Renaud
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2002-09

4.  Arginases in parasitic diseases.

Authors:  Philippe Vincendeau; Alain P Gobert; Sylvie Daulouède; Daniel Moynet; M Djavad Mossalayi
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2003-01

5.  The power and the limitations of cross-species protein identification by mass spectrometry-driven sequence similarity searches.

Authors:  Bianca Habermann; Jeffrey Oegema; Shamil Sunyaev; Andrej Shevchenko
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2003-12-26       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  Crosstalk between plant responses to pathogens and herbivores: a view from the outside in.

Authors:  Jane E Taylor; Paul E Hatcher; Nigel D Paul
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 7.  Application of proteomics in phylogenetic and evolutionary studies.

Authors:  Alfonso Navas; Juan Pablo Albar
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 8.  Similarities between the Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways.

Authors:  Daniel Kalderon
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 20.808

9.  The proteomics: a new prospect for studying parasitic manipulation.

Authors:  David G Biron; Cecile Joly; Nathalie Galeotti; Fleur Ponton; Laurent Marché
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 10.  Rats, cats, people and parasites: the impact of latent toxoplasmosis on behaviour.

Authors:  J P Webster
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.700

View more
  30 in total

1.  Protein expression parallels thermal tolerance and ecologic changes in the diversification of a diving beetle species complex.

Authors:  A Hidalgo-Galiana; M Monge; D G Biron; F Canals; I Ribera; A Cieslak
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The evolution of parasite manipulation of host dispersal.

Authors:  Sébastien Lion; Minus van Baalen; William G Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Transcriptomics of an extended phenotype: parasite manipulation of wasp social behaviour shifts expression of caste-related genes.

Authors:  Amy C Geffre; Ruolin Liu; Fabio Manfredini; Laura Beani; Jeyaraney Kathirithamby; Christina M Grozinger; Amy L Toth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Wolbachia Influences the Production of Octopamine and Affects Drosophila Male Aggression.

Authors:  Chelsie E Rohrscheib; Elizabeth Bondy; Peter Josh; Markus Riegler; Darryl Eyles; Bruno van Swinderen; Michael W Weible; Jeremy C Brownlie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Specialized structures on the border between rhizocephalan parasites and their host's nervous system reveal potential sites for host-parasite interactions.

Authors:  A Miroliubov; I Borisenko; M Nesterenko; A Lianguzova; S Ilyutkin; N Lapshin; A Dobrovolskij
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Adaptive suicide: is a kin-selected driver of fatal behaviours likely?

Authors:  Rosalind K Humphreys; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  When fiction becomes fact: exaggerating host manipulation by parasites.

Authors:  Jean-François Doherty
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Control of brain development, function, and behavior by the microbiome.

Authors:  Timothy R Sampson; Sarkis K Mazmanian
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 21.023

9.  Do distantly related parasites rely on the same proximate factors to alter the behaviour of their hosts?

Authors:  F Ponton; T Lefevre; C Lebarbenchon; F Thomas; H D Loxdale; L Marché; L Renault; M J Perrot-Minnot; D G Biron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Graveyards on the move: the spatio-temporal distribution of dead ophiocordyceps-infected ants.

Authors:  Maj-Britt Pontoppidan; Winanda Himaman; Nigel L Hywel-Jones; Jacobus J Boomsma; David P Hughes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.