Literature DB >> 16191596

Persistence of seeds from crops of conventional and herbicide tolerant oilseed rape (Brassica napus).

Peter J W Lutman1, Kate Berry, Roger W Payne, Euan Simpson, Jeremy B Sweet, Gillian T Champion, Mike J May, Pat Wightman, Kerr Walker, Martin Lainsbury.   

Abstract

A series of rotation experiments at five sites over four years has explored the environmental and agronomic implications of growing herbicide tolerant oilseed rape and sugar beet. This paper reports on the population dynamics of volunteer rape (Brassica napus). The experiments compared four winter oilseed rape (WOSR) cultivars: a conventional cultivar (Apex) and three developmental cultivars either genetically modified (GM) to be tolerant to glyphosate or glufosinate, or conventionally bred to be tolerant to herbicides of the imidazolinone group. Seed losses at harvest averaged 3575 seeds m(-2) but ranged from less than 2000 up to more than 10000 seeds m(-2). There was a rapid decline in seed numbers during the first few months after harvest, resulting in a mean loss of seeds of 60%. In subsequent seasons, the seedbank declined much more slowly at four of the five sites (ca 20% per year) and the models predicted 95% seed loss after approximately 9 years. Seed decline was much faster at the fifth site. There were no clear differences between the four cultivars in either the numbers of seeds shed at harvest or in their subsequent persistence. The importance of the persistence of GM rape seeds, in the context of the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops and the role of good management practices that minimize seed persistence, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16191596      PMCID: PMC1559884          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  2 in total

1.  Burial and seed survival in Brassica napus subsp. oleifera and Sinapis arvensis including a comparison of transgenic and non-transgenic lines of the crop.

Authors:  R S Hails; M Rees; D D Kohn; M J Crawley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields.

Authors:  Mary A Rieger; Michael Lamond; Christopher Preston; Stephen B Powles; Richard T Roush
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  13 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in the distribution of genetically modified and conventional oilseed rape within fields and seed lots.

Authors:  Graham S Begg; Martin J Elliott; Danny W Cullen; Pietro P M Iannetta; Geoff R Squire
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Long-term persistence of GM oilseed rape in the seedbank.

Authors:  Tina D'Hertefeldt; Rikke B Jørgensen; Lars B Pettersson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Feral genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape from seed import spills: are concerns scientifically justified?

Authors:  Yann Devos; Rosemary S Hails; Antoine Messéan; Joe N Perry; Geoffrey R Squire
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Seed bank persistence of genetically modified canola in California.

Authors:  Douglas J Munier; Kent L Brittan; W Thomas Lanini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape 73496 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2012-109).

Authors:  Hanspeter Naegeli; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Ewen Mullins; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Michele Ardizzone; Yann Devos; Silvia Federici; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Andrea Gennaro; Jose Ángel Gómez Ruiz; Franco Maria Neri; Nikoletta Papadopoulou; Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos; Anna Lanzoni
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17

6.  Molecular differentiation of commercial varieties and feral populations of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.).

Authors:  Kathrin Pascher; Susanne Macalka; Domenico Rau; Günter Gollmann; Helmut Reiner; Josef Glössl; Georg Grabherr
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Seed spillage from grain trailers on road verges during oilseed rape harvest: an experimental survey.

Authors:  Diane Bailleul; Sébastien Ollier; Sylvie Huet; Antoine Gardarin; Jane Lecomte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Long-term monitoring of feral genetically modified herbicide-tolerant Brassica napus populations around unloading Japanese ports.

Authors:  Kensuke Katsuta; Kazuhito Matsuo; Yasuyuki Yoshimura; Ryo Ohsawa
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Tempest in a tea pot: How did the public conversation on genetically modified crops drift so far from the facts?

Authors:  Daniel A Goldstein
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2014-06

10.  Seed bank dynamics govern persistence of Brassica hybrids in crop and natural habitats.

Authors:  Danny A P Hooftman; James M Bullock; Kathryn Morley; Caroline Lamb; David J Hodgson; Philippa Bell; Jane Thomas; Rosemary S Hails
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.