Literature DB >> 16190964

Outcome of patients requiring tracheostomy in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Paulo Sérgio Lucas Da Silva1, Jaques Waisberg, Chiu Seing Tsok Paulo, Fernando Colugnati, Lourdes Conceição Martins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure, there is a lack of studies in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting that describe its association with patient outcome and especially hospital mortality. Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of patients receiving a tracheostomy, while on mechanical ventilation (MV), in a PICU.
METHODS: Records of 260 children were reviewed retrospectively regarding PICU mortality, PICU length of stay (PICU LOS), duration of MV and a cost indicator (weighted hospital days; WHD).
RESULTS: Nineteen patients received tracheostomy (7.3%). The mortality of patients submitted to tracheostomy in the longer term was significantly higher compared to patients who were not (52.6%vs. 27.6%; P = 0.04) despite having a significantly lower severity of illness at admission (Pediatric Risk of Mortality score--PRISM) (10.9 vs. 13.7; P < 0.001). The mortality of patients without tracheostomy, however, was significantly higher within 30 days (24.8%vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001). Tracheostomized patients had significantly higher mean PICU LOS (68 days vs. 8 days; P < 0.001), duration of MV (62 days vs. 4 days; P < 0.001) and higher WHD (171.5 vs. 21.5; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Contrary to findings in critically ill adult patients, ventilated children receiving a tracheostomy had less favorable outcomes compared with non-tracheostomized patients. In view of the greater use of resources, further studies are needed to confirm and to identify the subgroups of mechanically ventilated patients who will benefit most from this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16190964     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2005.02118.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Int        ISSN: 1328-8067            Impact factor:   1.524


  6 in total

1.  Starplasty tracheostomy: case series and literature review.

Authors:  Yehuda Schwarz; Nidal Muhanna; David Raveh; Chanan Shaul; Sarit Shahroor; Uri Peleg; Pierre Attal; Jean-Yves Sichel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Airway obstruction caused by rapid enlargement of cervical lymphangioma in a five-month-old boy.

Authors:  Junji Shimizu; Takashi Taga; Takuma Kishimoto; Motoki Ohta; Kouji Tagawa; Tomoaki Kunitsu; Tetsunobu Yamane; Yasuyuki Tsujita; Yoshihiro Kubota; Yutaka Eguchi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2016-08-17

3.  Comparison of outcomes between vertical and transverse skin incisions in percutaneous tracheostomy for critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Lim; Won Gun Kwack; Youlim Kim; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Ho Il Yoon; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee; Young-Jae Cho
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  The outcomes of children with tracheostomy in a tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit in Turkey.

Authors:  Fulya Kamit Can; Ayşe Berna Anıl; Murat Anıl; Murat Gümüşsoy; Hale Çitlenbik; Tolga Kandoğan; Neslihan Zengin
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2018-09-01

5.  Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: When and Where?

Authors:  Ilker Ertugrul; Selman Kesici; Benan Bayrakci; Omer Faruk Unal
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 0.364

6.  Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-A Two Decades of Experience.

Authors:  Anil Sachdev; Nilay D Chaudhari; Bhanu P Singh; Nikhil Sharma; Dhiren Gupta; Neeraj Gupta; Suresh Gupta; Parul Chugh
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.