PURPOSE: We report our experience with laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction by division of the anterior crossing vein and cephalad relocation of the anterior crossing artery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used this laparoscopic approach in four male and six female patients with UPJ obstruction associated with anterior crossing vessels. The mean age of the patients was 31.9 years (range 14-59 years). The obstruction was present on the right side in four and on the left side in six patients. Using a transperitoneal approach, the crossing vein was divided, while the crossing artery was preserved, relocated cephalad, and fixed to the peripelvic tissues with metal clips or sutures. Because a grossly normal appearance of the UPJ and upper ureter together with proper pyeloureteral peristalsis and complete renal pelvic emptying were observed intraoperatively, dismembered pyeloplasty was not performed in any of these patients. Diuretic renography and intravenous urography were performed 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean operative duration was 140 minutes (range 100-170 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 2.9 days (range 2-5 days), and the mean follow-up was 9.1 months (range 3-22 months). Diuretic renography revealed absence of obstruction in all patients, and intravenous urography showed considerable improvement of the hydronephrosis. CONCLUSION: Select cases of UPJ obstruction associated with anterior crossing vessels seem to be amenable to laparoscopic management by division of the crossing vein and cephalad relocation of the crossing artery. Laparoscopy as a minimally invasive approach may offer a better opportunity to evaluate the role of anterior crossing vessels in UPJ obstruction.
PURPOSE: We report our experience with laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction by division of the anterior crossing vein and cephalad relocation of the anterior crossing artery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used this laparoscopic approach in four male and six female patients with UPJ obstruction associated with anterior crossing vessels. The mean age of the patients was 31.9 years (range 14-59 years). The obstruction was present on the right side in four and on the left side in six patients. Using a transperitoneal approach, the crossing vein was divided, while the crossing artery was preserved, relocated cephalad, and fixed to the peripelvic tissues with metal clips or sutures. Because a grossly normal appearance of the UPJ and upper ureter together with proper pyeloureteral peristalsis and complete renal pelvic emptying were observed intraoperatively, dismembered pyeloplasty was not performed in any of these patients. Diuretic renography and intravenous urography were performed 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean operative duration was 140 minutes (range 100-170 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 2.9 days (range 2-5 days), and the mean follow-up was 9.1 months (range 3-22 months). Diuretic renography revealed absence of obstruction in all patients, and intravenous urography showed considerable improvement of the hydronephrosis. CONCLUSION: Select cases of UPJ obstruction associated with anterior crossing vessels seem to be amenable to laparoscopic management by division of the crossing vein and cephalad relocation of the crossing artery. Laparoscopy as a minimally invasive approach may offer a better opportunity to evaluate the role of anterior crossing vessels in UPJ obstruction.