Literature DB >> 16189825

Timing of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation does not affect the promotion of bone cell development.

Gwynne Hannay1, David Leavesley, Mark Pearcy.   

Abstract

Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) devices have been used clinically to promote the healing of surgically resistant fractures in vivo. However, there is a sparsity of data on how the timing of an applied PEMF effects the osteogenic cells that would be present within the fracture gap. The purpose of this study was to examine the response of osteoblast-like cells to a PEMF stimulus, mimicking that of a clinically available device, using four protocols for the timing of the stimulus. The PEMF signal consisted of a 5 ms pulse burst (containing 20 pulses) repeated at 15 Hz. Cultures of a human osteosarcoma cell line, SaOS-2, were exposed to the four timing protocols, each conducted over 3 days. Protocol one stimulated the cells for 8 h each day, protocol two stimulated the cells for 24 h on the first day, protocol three stimulated the cells for 24 h on the second day, and protocol four stimulated the cells for 24 h on the third day. Cells were seeded with either 25,000 or 50,000 cells/well (24-well cell culture plates). All assays showed reduced proliferation and increased differentiation (alkaline phosphatase activity) in the PEMF stimulated cultures compared with the control cultures, except for protocol four alkaline phosphatase measurements. No clear trend was observed between the four protocols; however this may be due to cell density. The results indicated that an osteoblast-like cell line is responsive to a 15 Hz PEMF stimulus, which will stimulate the cell line to into an increasing state of maturity. Bioelectromagnetics (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16189825     DOI: 10.1002/bem.20166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  7 in total

1.  Clinical significance of different effects of static and pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoclast cultures.

Authors:  Simona Angela Barnaba; Laura Ruzzini; Alberto Di Martino; Angela Lanotte; Alessandro Sgambato; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Effects of sinusoidal electromagnetic field on structure and function of different kinds of cell lines.

Authors:  Ah Ram Sul; Si-Nae Park; Hwal Suh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  A novel single pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone repair.

Authors:  Yin-Chih Fu; Chih-Chun Lin; Je-Ken Chang; Chung-Hwan Chen; I-Chun Tai; Gwo-Jaw Wang; Mei-Ling Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic field on in vitro fertilization success rate in N MRI mice.

Authors:  Leili Hafizi; Ameneh Sazgarnia; Nezhat Mousavifar; Mohammad Karimi; Saleh Ghorbani; Mohammad Reza Kazemi; Neda Emami Meibodi; Golkoo Hosseini; Hesam Mostafavi Toroghi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Enhancement of differentiation and mineralisation of osteoblast-like cells by degenerate electrical waveform in an in vitro electrical stimulation model compared to capacitive coupling.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Anil Sebastian; James Colthurst; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields to Promote Bone Responses to Biomaterials In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carlo Galli; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte; Stefano Guizzardi
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2018-09-03

Review 7.  Translational Insights into Extremely Low Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (ELF-PEMFs) for Bone Regeneration after Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Sabrina Ehnert; Steffen Schröter; Romina H Aspera-Werz; Wiebke Eisler; Karsten Falldorf; Michael Ronniger; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.