Literature DB >> 16189692

Comparative study of autologous pubovaginal sling and synthetic transobturator (TOT) SAFYRE sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Agnaldo L Silva-Filho1, Eduardo B Cândido, Alessandra Noronha, Sérgio A Triginelli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare short-term results of autologous pubovaginal sling and synthetic transobturator (TOT) SAFYRE sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS: Twenty women referred for surgical treatment of SUI were assigned randomly to autologous pubovaginal sling or synthetic TOT sling. Inclusion criteria were primary treatment of SUI and urodynamic study showing SUI without detrusor overactivity. Pre- and postoperative quantification of the severity of incontinence was done by pad test and a validated questionnaire (King's Health Questionnaire).
RESULTS: There were no differences in patients' mean age, parity, body mass index, rate of postmenopausal state, pelvic floor defects and mean Valsalva leak point pressure in the preoperative urodynamic study. Mean operating time (21.1 +/- 3.8 vs. 69.5 +/- 23.7 min; P < 0.001) and hospital stay (28.8 +/- 8.4 vs. 44.4 +/- 5.8 h; P < 0.001) was shorter in the TOT than the autologous group. The postoperative pad test (39.4 +/- 12.5 vs. 8.4 +/- 5.2 g; P = 0.01) and the absent in the improvement in the quality of life were significantly higher in the TOT group.
CONCLUSION: Our initial results suggest that the synthetic TOT technique had worse effectiveness for treating female SUI compared to autologous pubovaginal sling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16189692     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-005-0083-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

Review 1.  The use of synthetic sub-urethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Andrew Feifer; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-04-27

Review 2.  [Stress urinary incontinence. Evidence for 4 minimally invasive methods of treating - systematic overview].

Authors:  S Mathis; B Guba; C Adlbrecht; C Pramesberger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Haroon Rehman; Carlos A Bezerra; Homero Bruschini; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-26

Review 4.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Lucky Saraswat; Haroon Rehman; Muhammad Imran Omar; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.