P Gastmeier1, D Sohr, C Brandt, T Eckmanns, M Behnke, H Rüden. 1. Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical School Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Gastmeier.Petra@mh-hannover.de
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The German national nosocomial infections surveillance system (KISS) has been collecting surveillance data from hip and knee prosthesis operations since 1997. The purpose of this article is to investigate whether surveillance and feedback of surgical site infection (SSI) information to the physicians and nurses of participating hospitals lead to reduced SSI rates or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Only information from hospitals previously participating for at least 3 years was used for the analysis. Monthly SSI rates were pooled over the 36-month period, beginning in each clinic's case with its first month of participation, the rates then being compared for 12-month periods. Relative risks were calculated for comparison of the SSI rates in the first and third years of participation. A multiple logistic regression analysis with stepwise variable selection was performed to identify significant risk factors, including the year of surveillance after starting surveillance activities. RESULTS: The overall SSI rates were 1.4% for hip prosthesis and 1.0% for knee prosthesis. Fourteen clinics participated in KISS for at least 3 years continuously with HIP prostheses and 21 with knee prostheses. It was possible to include a total of 15,457 hip and 9,011 knee procedures for this analysis. A comparison of data from the first and the third years show a significant SSI reduction with hip procedures, with a relative risk of 0.54 (CI95 0.38-0.77), and a trend towards reduced SSI rates for knee procedures. The multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the SSI rate for hip prosthesis was significantly lower in the third year than in the first year of surveillance (OR = 0.57; CI95 0.42-0.78), though for knee prosthesis the level of significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: A reduction of SSIs following hip and knee prosthesis operations through the introduction of ongoing surveillance and the possibility of using benchmark data for comparison does seem to be possible in many institutions.
INTRODUCTION: The German national nosocomial infections surveillance system (KISS) has been collecting surveillance data from hip and knee prosthesis operations since 1997. The purpose of this article is to investigate whether surveillance and feedback of surgical site infection (SSI) information to the physicians and nurses of participating hospitals lead to reduced SSI rates or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Only information from hospitals previously participating for at least 3 years was used for the analysis. Monthly SSI rates were pooled over the 36-month period, beginning in each clinic's case with its first month of participation, the rates then being compared for 12-month periods. Relative risks were calculated for comparison of the SSI rates in the first and third years of participation. A multiple logistic regression analysis with stepwise variable selection was performed to identify significant risk factors, including the year of surveillance after starting surveillance activities. RESULTS: The overall SSI rates were 1.4% for hip prosthesis and 1.0% for knee prosthesis. Fourteen clinics participated in KISS for at least 3 years continuously with HIP prostheses and 21 with knee prostheses. It was possible to include a total of 15,457 hip and 9,011 knee procedures for this analysis. A comparison of data from the first and the third years show a significant SSI reduction with hip procedures, with a relative risk of 0.54 (CI95 0.38-0.77), and a trend towards reduced SSI rates for knee procedures. The multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the SSI rate for hip prosthesis was significantly lower in the third year than in the first year of surveillance (OR = 0.57; CI95 0.42-0.78), though for knee prosthesis the level of significance was not achieved. CONCLUSION: A reduction of SSIs following hip and knee prosthesis operations through the introduction of ongoing surveillance and the possibility of using benchmark data for comparison does seem to be possible in many institutions.
Authors: Esa Jämsen; Ove Furnes; Lars B Engesaeter; Yrjö T Konttinen; Anders Odgaard; Anna Stefánsdóttir; Lars Lidgren Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Gabriel Birgand; Didier Lepelletier; Gabriel Baron; Steve Barrett; Ann-Christin Breier; Cagri Buke; Ljiljana Markovic-Denic; Petra Gastmeier; Jan Kluytmans; Outi Lyytikainen; Elizabeth Sheridan; Emese Szilagyi; Evelina Tacconelli; Nicolas Troillet; Philippe Ravaud; Jean-Christophe Lucet Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 3.240