Literature DB >> 16189062

Efficacy and tolerability of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs compared with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis.

Bruce Arroll1, Steve Macgillivray, Simon Ogston, Ian Reid, Frank Sullivan, Brian Williams, Iain Crombie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Depression is common in primary care. There are no systematic reviews of depression treatment comparing antidepressants with placebo; hence, we do not know whether these medications are effective in primary care.
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group register of controlled trials, MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical abstracts, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Abstracts of potential studies were reviewed independently by 2 authors. Studies needed to include randomized controlled trials of either a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), or both, and placebo in a primary care setting. The data and quality of the studies were extracted and assessed by 2 authors blind to the other's choice. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. The main outcome measures were the standardized mean difference and weighted mean difference of the final mean depression scores, the relative risk of improvement, and the number withdrawing because of side effects. Pooling of results was done using Review Manager 4.2.2.
RESULTS: There were 10 studies in which TCAs were compared with placebo, 3 in which SSRIs were compared with placebo, and 2 with both compared with placebo. One half of the studies were of low methodological quality, and nearly all studies were of short duration, typically 6 to 8 weeks. Pooled estimates of efficacy data showed a relative risk of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.12-1.42) for improvement with TCAs compared with placebo; For SSRIs, relative risk was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.21-1.55). Most patients, 56% to 60%, responded well to active treatment compared with 42% to 47% for placebo. The number needed to treat for TCAs was about 4, and for SSRIs it was 6. The numbers needed to harm (for withdrawal caused by side effects) ranged from 5 to 11 for TCAs and 21 to 94 for SSRIs. Low-dose (100 mg or 75 mg) as well as high-dose TCAs were effective.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review is the first comparing antidepressants with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care. Both TCAs and SSRIs are effective. This review is also the first to show that low-dose TCAs are effective in primary care. Prescribing antidepressants in primary care is a more effective clinical activity than prescribing placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16189062      PMCID: PMC1466912          DOI: 10.1370/afm.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  31 in total

1.  Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  I M Anderson; B M Tomenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

2.  Is primary care essential?

Authors:  B Starfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-10-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  A systematic review of newer pharmacotherapies for depression in adults: evidence report summary.

Authors:  J W Williams; C D Mulrow; E Chiquette; P H Noël; C Aguilar; J Cornell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A placebo-controlled multicenter trial of Limbitrol versus its components (amitriptyline and chlordiazepoxide) in the symptomatic treatment of depressive illness.

Authors:  J P Feighner; B Brauzer; A J Gelenberg; E Gomez; A Kiev; M L Kurland; B L Weiss
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-03-22       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Efficacy of venlafaxine in depressive illness in general practice.

Authors:  Y Lecrubier; M Bourin; C A Moon; F Schifano; C Blanchard; P Danjou; D Hackett
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  Antidepressant treatment of depression: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  R Joffe; S Sokolov; D Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.356

7.  Are SSRIs better than TCAs? Comparison of SSRIs and TCAs: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D C Steffens; K R Krishnan; M J Helms
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of sertraline and dothiepin in the treatment of major depression in general practice.

Authors:  D P Doogan; C J Langdon
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.659

9.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  F Song; N Freemantle; T A Sheldon; A House; P Watson; A Long; J Mason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-13

10.  Controlled trial of amitriptyline in general practice.

Authors:  T G Blashki; R Mowbray; B Davies
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-01-16
View more
  90 in total

Review 1.  Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  A randomized trial to reduce the prevalence of depression and self-harm behavior in older primary care patients.

Authors:  Osvaldo P Almeida; Jane Pirkis; Ngaire Kerse; Moira Sim; Leon Flicker; John Snowdon; Brian Draper; Gerard Byrne; Robert Goldney; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Nigel Stocks; Helman Alfonso; Jon J Pfaff
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Effect of low-dose acute tryptophan depletion on the specificity of autobiographical memory in healthy subjects with a family history of depression.

Authors:  Hamid A Alhaj; Matthew Selman; Victoria Jervis; Jacqui Rodgers; Stephen Barton; R Hamish McAllister-Williams
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  In this issue: Subtle clinical policy.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Randomized Clinical Trial of Real-Time fMRI Amygdala Neurofeedback for Major Depressive Disorder: Effects on Symptoms and Autobiographical Memory Recall.

Authors:  Kymberly D Young; Greg J Siegle; Vadim Zotev; Raquel Phillips; Masaya Misaki; Han Yuan; Wayne C Drevets; Jerzy Bodurka
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  We need a chronic disease management model for depression in primary care.

Authors:  Andre Tylee; Paul Walters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Antidepressants as analgesics.

Authors:  Gary McCleane
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Managing depression in primary care: it's not only what you do it's the way that you do it.

Authors:  Jed Boardman; Paul Walters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Acupuncture treatment modulates the corticostriatal reward circuitry in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Zengjian Wang; Xiaoyun Wang; Jian Liu; Jun Chen; Xian Liu; Guangning Nie; Kristen Jorgenson; Ki Cheul Sohn; Ruiwang Huang; Ming Liu; Bo Liu; Jian Kong
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 10.  Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency.

Authors:  Melissa A Cyders; Gregory T Smith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.