Literature DB >> 16188358

Principles and practices of health risk assessment under current EU regulations.

Christina Rudén1.   

Abstract

Risk assessments serve as the foundation of regulatory decision-making on whether to take actions to reduce (or otherwise manage) a toxicological or ecotoxicological risk or not. To understand the complex process that leads from the generation of scientific data, via risk assessment to risk management decision-making, close studies of the scientific basis and risk assessment methods must be undertaken. This paper consists of two main parts. In the first part the principles of the European Union process for risk assessments, as defined by legislations and official guidelines, are briefly outlined. In the second part the actual workings of this system are exemplified by the results from case studies of the risk assessment processes for trichloroethylene and for acrylamide. The analysis and comparison of these two cases illustrates: (1) that generation of a large amount of data does not ensure consensus among risk assessors, (2) that controversy can regard different levels of detail, (3) that controversy can arise at different organizational and theoretical levels, (4) that risk assessments may be subject to (public) criticism even if the experts agree, and (5) that "scientific" controversies have a significant policy component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16188358     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  3 in total

1.  Isoflurane waste anesthetic gas concentrations associated with the open-drop method.

Authors:  Douglas K Taylor; Deborah M Mook
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Trichloroethylene and cancer: systematic and quantitative review of epidemiologic evidence for identifying hazards.

Authors:  Cheryl Siegel Scott; Jennifer Jinot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Consensus on the key characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as a basis for hazard identification.

Authors:  Michele A La Merrill; Laura N Vandenberg; Martyn T Smith; William Goodson; Patience Browne; Heather B Patisaul; Kathryn Z Guyton; Andreas Kortenkamp; Vincent J Cogliano; Tracey J Woodruff; Linda Rieswijk; Hideko Sone; Kenneth S Korach; Andrea C Gore; Lauren Zeise; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 43.330

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.