| Literature DB >> 16187869 |
Gerald J Haffel1, Lyn Y Abramson, Zachary R Voelz, Gerald I Metalsky, Lisa Halberstadt, Benjamin M Dykman, Patricia Donovan, Michael E Hogan, Benjamin L Hankin, Lauren B Alloy.
Abstract
Results from studies using a behavioral high-risk design and approximations to it generally have corroborated the cognitive vulnerability hypothesis of depression, whereas results from remitted depression studies typically have not. Suspecting that design features of previously conducted remitted designs likely precluded them from detecting maladaptive cognitive patterns, the authors conducted a study featuring the remitted design that has been successful in studies of a biological vulnerability for depression. Participants' current depressive symptoms, negative cognitive styles (hopelessness theory), dysfunctional attitudes (Beck's theory), and lifetime prevalence of clinically significant depression were assessed. Participants who had remitted from an episode of clinically significant depression had more negative cognitive styles, but not greater levels of dysfunctional attitudes, than did never depressed individuals. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16187869 DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emotion ISSN: 1528-3542