Literature DB >> 16187844

The many facets of the locomotor response to a novel environment test: theoretical comment on Mitchell, Cunningham, and Mark (2005).

Michela Marinelli1.   

Abstract

Several animal studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between locomotor activity in response to a novel environment and acquisition of drug self-administration behavior. This finding led to the assumption that animals with heightened reactivity to novel environments are more sensitive to the rewarding effects of drugs compared with animals with reduced reactivity. But are these individuals really more responsive to drugs, or could they have enhanced sensitivity to rewards in general or even simply be better learners? In the previous issue of this journal, J. M. Mitchell, C. L. Cunningham, and G. P. Mark (2005), investigated these important matters. They reported that the locomotor response to a novel environment does not predict responding for cocaine but reflects overall differences in the ability to learn operant tasks. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187844     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.4.1144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  15 in total

1.  Response to novelty and cocaine stimulant effects: lack of stability across environments in female Swiss mice.

Authors:  Laura Nyssen; Christian Brabant; Vincent Didone; Etienne Quertemont
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place preference in male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Richard M Allen; Carson V Everett; Anna M Nelson; Joshua M Gulley; Nancy R Zahniser
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 3.  Dopamine ups and downs in vulnerability to addictions: a neurodevelopmental model.

Authors:  Marco Leyton; Paul Vezina
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  Role of individual and developmental differences in voluntary cocaine intake in rats.

Authors:  Nicole L Schramm-Sapyta; Marty C Cauley; Dalene K Stangl; Susan Glowacz; K Amy Stepp; Edward D Levin; Cynthia M Kuhn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Genetics of novelty seeking, amphetamine self-administration and reinstatement using inbred rats.

Authors:  A C Meyer; S Rahman; R J Charnigo; L P Dwoskin; J C Crabbe; M T Bardo
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Differential housing and novelty response: Protection and risk from locomotor sensitization.

Authors:  Erik J Garcia; Tara N Haddon; Donald A Saucier; Mary E Cain
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Predicting extinction and reinstatement of alcohol and sucrose self-administration in outbred rats.

Authors:  Therese A Kosten; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity.

Authors:  Mary E Cain; Rosemary A Coolon; Margaret J Gill
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Individual differences in dopamine cell neuroadaptations following cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  James E McCutcheon; Francis J White; Michela Marinelli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Editing of serotonin 2C receptor mRNA in the prefrontal cortex characterizes high-novelty locomotor response behavioral trait.

Authors:  Stella Dracheva; Rebecca Lyddon; Kevin Barley; Sue M Marcus; Yasmin L Hurd; William M Byne
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.