Literature DB >> 16187751

Biomarkers of space radiation risk.

Marco Durante1.   

Abstract

Radiation risk estimates are based on epidemiological data obtained on Earth for cohorts exposed predominantly to acute doses of gamma rays, and the extrapolation to the space environment is highly problematic and error-prone. The uncertainty can be reduced if risk estimates are compared directly to space radiation-induced biological alterations, i.e. by detecting biomarkers in astronauts. Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes are the only biomarker that can provide simultaneous information on dose, dose equivalent and risk, and they have been measured extensively in astronauts during the past 10 years. Individual relative risks calculated from chromosomal aberration measurements in crew members after single space missions in low-Earth orbit fall in the same range as the estimates derived from physical dosimetry, suggesting that the current system for radiogenic risk evaluation is essentially sound. However, the output of the biomarker test is dependent upon the sampling time. Recent results show a fast time-dependent decay of chromosomal aberrations in blood lymphocytes after space flight and a lack of correlation between translocations and cumulative dose in astronauts involved in two to five space missions. This "time factor" may reflect individual variability and time dependence in the risk produced by exposure to cosmic radiation during the flight. Biomarkers may be superior to dose in predicting space radiation risk, pending technical improvements in sensitivity, and validation by epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187751     DOI: 10.1667/rr3359.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

Review 2.  Using space-based investigations to inform cancer research on Earth.

Authors:  Jeanne L Becker; Glauco R Souza
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Shielding of relativistic protons.

Authors:  A Bertucci; M Durante; G Gialanella; G Grossi; L Manti; M Pugliese; P Scampoli; D Mancusi; L Sihver; A Rusek
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.017

4.  Geometrical Properties of the Nucleus and Chromosome Intermingling Are Possible Major Parameters of Chromosome Aberration Formation.

Authors:  Floriane Poignant; Ianik Plante; Zarana S Patel; Janice L Huff; Tony C Slaba
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Glutathione depletion and carbon ion radiation potentiate clustered DNA lesions, cell death and prevent chromosomal changes in cancer cells progeny.

Authors:  Maïté Hanot; Anthony Boivin; Céline Malésys; Michaël Beuve; Anthony Colliaux; Nicolas Foray; Thierry Douki; Dominique Ardail; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A novel method for biodosimetry.

Authors:  Wael Abdel Megid; Martin G Ensenberger; Richard B Halberg; Stephen A Stanhope; Marijo G Kent-First; Tomas A Prolla; Jeff W Bacher
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.017

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.