Literature DB >> 16187460

The emergency department utility of Simplify D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients with pleuritic chest pain.

Kerstin Hogg1, Deborah Dawson, Kevin Mackway-Jones.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Pleuritic chest pain is a common presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED) and a symptom of pulmonary embolism. Patients with pleuritic chest pain would benefit from a simple and rapid way of screening for pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of Simplify D-dimer as a rule-out tool for pulmonary embolism in ED patients with pleuritic chest pain.
METHODS: This was a prospective diagnostic study in a large city-center ED. Four hundred twenty-five patients with pleuritic chest pain were prospectively recruited between February 2002 and June 2003. Simplify D-dimer testing was performed on each patient in the ED. All patients followed an independent reference standard diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary embolism. Each patient was followed up clinically for 3 months.
RESULTS: The calculated sensitivity of Simplify D-dimer for pulmonary embolism was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61.4% to 92.7%), and specificity was 74.2% (95% CI 69.6% to 78.4%). The negative predictive value was 98.6% (95% CI 96.6% to 99.6%), positive predictive value 15.0% (95% CI 9.1% to 22.7%), negative likelihood ratio 0.25 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.52) and positive likelihood ratio 3.17 (95% CI 2.30 to 3.97). The study cohort pretest probability was 5.3%. A negative Simplify result reduced the posttest probability to 1.3% (95% CI 0.5% to 3.4%).
CONCLUSION: The Simplify D-dimer is not sufficiently sensitive to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in all patients presenting to the ED with pleuritic chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187460     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  4 in total

1.  D-dimer for the diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a Janus-face marker.

Authors:  Roberto Manfredini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Fay Crawford; Alina Andras; Karen Welch; Karen Sheares; David Keeling; Francesca M Chappell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

3.  Excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care using the Wells-rule in combination with a point-of care D-dimer test: a scenario analysis.

Authors:  Wim A M Lucassen; Renée A Douma; Diane B Toll; Harry R Büller; Henk C P M van Weert
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  D-dimer testing: advantages and limitations in emergency medicine for managing acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  D Imberti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 3.397

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.