Literature DB >> 16187245

The effects of static friction and backlash on extended physiological proprioception control of a powered prosthesis.

Todd R Farrell1, Richard F Weir, Craig W Heckathorne, Dudley S Childress.   

Abstract

In general, externally powered prostheses do not provide proprioceptive feedback and thus require the user to rely on cognitively expensive visual feedback to effectively control the prosthesis. Applying the concept of extended physiological proprioception (EPP) to externally powered prostheses provides direct feedback to the user's proprioceptive system regarding the position, velocity, and forces applied to the prosthesis. However, electric elbows with EPP controllers developed at the Northwestern University Prosthetics Research Laboratory have exhibited unexplained "jerky" behavior in both clinical fittings and bench-top operation. In addition, the development of limit cycles, a specific type of constant-amplitude oscillation, had been observed in bench-top use of these elbows. Backlash and static friction within the EPP system were found to be primarily responsible for the development of limit cycles. Reducing static friction and backlash improved the system's performance. These results suggest that to most effectively implement EPP, prosthesis manufacturers should design prosthetic components that minimize static friction and backlash.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187245     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.05.0052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  4 in total

Review 1.  How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Sarah Blackstone; Cathy Bodine; John Brabyn; David Brienza; Kevin Caves; Frank DeRuyter; Edmund Durfee; Stefania Fatone; Geoff Fernie; Steven Gard; Patricia Karg; Todd A Kuiken; Gerald F Harris; Mike Jones; Yue Li; Jordana Maisel; Michael McCue; Michelle A Meade; Helena Mitchell; Tracy L Mitzner; James L Patton; Philip S Requejo; James H Rimmer; Wendy A Rogers; W Zev Rymer; Jon A Sanford; Lawrence Schneider; Levin Sliker; Stephen Sprigle; Aaron Steinfeld; Edward Steinfeld; Gregg Vanderheiden; Carolee Winstein; Li-Qun Zhang; Thomas Corfman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.262

2.  Limb-state information encoded by peripheral and central somatosensory neurons: implications for an afferent interface.

Authors:  Douglas J Weber; Brian M London; James A Hokanson; Christopher A Ayers; Robert A Gaunt; Ricardo R Torres; Boubker Zaaimi; Lee E Miller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  Non-invasive control interfaces for intention detection in active movement-assistive devices.

Authors:  Joan Lobo-Prat; Peter N Kooren; Arno H A Stienen; Just L Herder; Bart F J M Koopman; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  DRG microstimulation evokes postural responses in awake, standing felines.

Authors:  Kevin W King; William F Cusack; Ameya C Nanivadekar; Christopher A Ayers; M A Urbin; Robert A Gaunt; Lee E Fisher; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.043

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.