Literature DB >> 1618706

Single-fibre and whole-nerve responses to clicks as a function of sound intensity in the guinea pig.

H Versnel1, R Schoonhoven, V F Prijs.   

Abstract

This paper describes a study of the intensity dependence of click-evoked responses of auditory-nerve fibres in relation to the simultaneously recorded compound action potential (CAP). Condensation and rarefaction clicks were presented to normal hearing guinea pigs over an intensity range of 60 dB. The recorded poststimulus time histograms (PSTHs) were characterized by the latency (tp), amplitude (Ap) and synchronization (Sp) of their dominant peak, parameters that are particularly important for the understanding of the CAP. For all fibres tp decreased monotonically with increasing intensity, in a continuous way for fibres with high characteristic frequency (CF greater than 3 kHz), and in discrete steps of one CF-cycle for low-CF (CF less than or equal to 3 kHz) fibres. An additional analysis of PSTH envelopes revealed that average latency shifts with intensity are similar for all CFs above 2 kHz. For all fibres Ap increased monotonically with intensity; the increase was stronger and maximum values were larger for low-CF than for high-CF fibres. A schematic model PSTH was then formulated on the basis of the experimental data. A sum of these model PSTHs from a hypothesized fibre population was convolved with an elemental unit response (Versnel et al., 1992) in order to simulate the compound action potential. Synthesized CAPs agreed with experimental CAPs in their main aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1618706     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90111-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Temporal integration of sound pressure determines thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  P Heil; H Neubauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Threshold and beyond: modeling the intensity dependence of auditory responses.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-14

3.  Auditory brainstem response at the detection limit.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner; Annemarie Seither-Preisler
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-08-14

4.  Auditory responses in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris to clicks: impulse response and signal analysis of neurophonic potential.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporary hearing loss influences post-stimulus time histogram and single neuron action potential estimates from human compound action potentials.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The influence of noise exposure on the parameters of a convolution model of the compound action potential.

Authors:  M E Chertoff; J T Lichtenhan; B M Tourtillott; K S Esau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Summing Across Different Active Zones can Explain the Quasi-Linear Ca-Dependencies of Exocytosis by Receptor Cells.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-25

8.  Mass Potentials Recorded at the Round Window Enable the Detection of Low Spontaneous Rate Fibers in Gerbil Auditory Nerve.

Authors:  Charlène Batrel; Antoine Huet; Florian Hasselmann; Jing Wang; Gilles Desmadryl; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jérôme Bourien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Tatyana E Fontenot; Christopher K Giardina; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.