OBJECTIVE: To assess the practice of skills learnt by basic health workers for 4 - 8 weeks and one year after IMCI training, and to identify the gaps in practices due to various constraints. METHODS: The Anganwadi Workers (AWWS) and the supervisory staff were given 5 days IMCI training using WHO package. The supervisors gave follow up visits to AWWs using standardized follow up forms adapted from WHO material. The supervisors gave follow up visit to the 1st batch of AWWs 1 year after training in IMCI and a second visit was given 4-8 weeks after the 1st visit. The 2nd batch of AWWs was followed up 4-8 weeks after training in IMCI. RESULTS: The performance on correct treatment of cases by AWWs weeks were trained 4-6 weeks prior to follow up was better than group followed up one year after the completion of training (81.8% and 47.9% respectively). At the same time, the performance on correct treatment showed significant improvement during the second follow up (47.9% and 83.8% respectively). Performance on counseling improved from 15.6% during 1st follow up to 52.1% during 2nd follow up visit. The average number of cases seen by AWWs increased from 6.6 in 1st follow up to 9.3 during second follow up of the same AWWs. CONCLUSION: The basic health workers (AWWs) are capable of correct case management of sick children using the IMCI guidelines. The first follow up visit should not be delayed as delay leads to loss of skills. The health workers benefit from frequent and regular follow up by supervisors. Provision of requisite supplies is essential for practice of skills after training in IMCI by basic health worker.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the practice of skills learnt by basic health workers for 4 - 8 weeks and one year after IMCI training, and to identify the gaps in practices due to various constraints. METHODS: The Anganwadi Workers (AWWS) and the supervisory staff were given 5 days IMCI training using WHO package. The supervisors gave follow up visits to AWWs using standardized follow up forms adapted from WHO material. The supervisors gave follow up visit to the 1st batch of AWWs 1 year after training in IMCI and a second visit was given 4-8 weeks after the 1st visit. The 2nd batch of AWWs was followed up 4-8 weeks after training in IMCI. RESULTS: The performance on correct treatment of cases by AWWs weeks were trained 4-6 weeks prior to follow up was better than group followed up one year after the completion of training (81.8% and 47.9% respectively). At the same time, the performance on correct treatment showed significant improvement during the second follow up (47.9% and 83.8% respectively). Performance on counseling improved from 15.6% during 1st follow up to 52.1% during 2nd follow up visit. The average number of cases seen by AWWs increased from 6.6 in 1st follow up to 9.3 during second follow up of the same AWWs. CONCLUSION: The basic health workers (AWWs) are capable of correct case management of sick children using the IMCI guidelines. The first follow up visit should not be delayed as delay leads to loss of skills. The health workers benefit from frequent and regular follow up by supervisors. Provision of requisite supplies is essential for practice of skills after training in IMCI by basic health worker.
Authors: Ingrid M le Roux; Mark Tomlinson; Jessica M Harwood; Mary J O'Connor; Carol M Worthman; Nokwanele Mbewu; Jacqueline Stewart; Mary Hartley; Dallas Swendeman; W Scott Comulada; Robert E Weiss; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Karl Blanchet; James J Lewis; Francisco Pozo-Martin; Arsene Satouro; Serge Somda; Patrick Ilboudo; Sophie Sarrassat; Simon Cousens Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 7.327