Tracy L Durrah1. 1. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 600 West 168th St, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA. tld5@columbia.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: I sought to determine correlates of daily smoking among recently arrested women involved in the Drug Use Forecasting Program (DUF), many of whom are illicit drug users. Also, I compared smoking rates among DUF women, who were illicit drug users, with rates among women taking part in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, who do not have high levels of drug use, to determine if drug use accounts for heavy smoking. METHODS: I compared daily smoking, illicit drug use, and selected demographic characteristics in 2 DUF cities: New York, with the highest rate of smoking among DUF cities in 1997, and Los Angeles, with the lowest. I also compared DUF and BRFSS daily smoking rates. RESULTS: Although rates of illicit drug use were similar in New York and Los Angeles (69.7% and 61.8%, respectively), the daily smoking rate was higher in New York (90.9% vs 41.7%). DUF smoking rates were higher than BRFSS rates; both rates were higher than the general population (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Illicit drug use does not, in all cases, explain high rates of daily smoking. Future efforts to shape tobacco-related public health policies in New York and elsewhere should involve collaboration with criminal justice transitional health programs.
OBJECTIVES: I sought to determine correlates of daily smoking among recently arrested women involved in the Drug Use Forecasting Program (DUF), many of whom are illicit drug users. Also, I compared smoking rates among DUF women, who were illicit drug users, with rates among women taking part in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, who do not have high levels of drug use, to determine if drug use accounts for heavy smoking. METHODS: I compared daily smoking, illicit drug use, and selected demographic characteristics in 2 DUF cities: New York, with the highest rate of smoking among DUF cities in 1997, and Los Angeles, with the lowest. I also compared DUF and BRFSS daily smoking rates. RESULTS: Although rates of illicit drug use were similar in New York and Los Angeles (69.7% and 61.8%, respectively), the daily smoking rate was higher in New York (90.9% vs 41.7%). DUF smoking rates were higher than BRFSS rates; both rates were higher than the general population (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Illicit drug use does not, in all cases, explain high rates of daily smoking. Future efforts to shape tobacco-related public health policies in New York and elsewhere should involve collaboration with criminal justice transitional health programs.
Authors: M Siegel; P D Mowery; T P Pechacek; W J Strauss; M W Schooley; R K Merritt; T E Novotny; G A Giovino; M P Eriksen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: R E Fullilove; M T Fullilove; M E Northridge; M L Ganz; M T Bassett; D E McLean; A A Aidala; D H Gemson; C McCord Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Pebbles Fagan; Gary King; Deirdre Lawrence; Sallie Anne Petrucci; Robert G Robinson; David Banks; Sharon Marable; Rachel Grana Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Karen Cropsey; Gloria Eldridge; Michael Weaver; Gabriela Villalobos; Maxine Stitzer; Al Best Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Hamza M Abdulghani; Norah A Alrowais; Ali I Alhaqwi; Ahmed Alrasheedi; Mohammed Al-Zahir; Ahmed Al-Madani; Abdulaziz Al-Eissa; Bader Al-Hakmi; Redwan Takroni; Farah Ahmad Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2013-08-21