Literature DB >> 16186029

The cognitive modulation of pain: hypnosis- and placebo-induced analgesia.

Ron Kupers1, Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville, Steven Laureys.   

Abstract

Nowadays, there is compelling evidence that there is a poor relationship between the incoming sensory input and the resulting pain sensation. Signals coming from the peripheral nervous system undergo a complex modulation by cognitive, affective, and motivational processes when they enter the central nervous system. Placebo- and hypnosis-induced analgesia form two extreme examples of how cognitive processes may influence the pain sensation. With the advent of modern brain imaging techniques, researchers have started to disentangle the brain mechanisms involved in these forms of cognitive modulation of pain. These studies have shown that the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices form important structures in a descending pathway that modulates incoming sensory input, likely via activation of the endogenous pain modulatory structures in the midbrain periaqueductal gray. Although little is known about the receptor systems involved in hypnosis-induced analgesia, studies of the placebo response suggest that the opiodergic and dopaminergic systems play an important role in the mediation of the placebo response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16186029     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50019-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  14 in total

1.  A qualitative analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing a cognitive-behavioral treatment with education.

Authors:  Melissa A Day; Beverly E Thorn; Shweta Kapoor
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Pain networks from the inside: Spatiotemporal analysis of brain responses leading from nociception to conscious perception.

Authors:  Hélène Bastuji; Maud Frot; Caroline Perchet; Michel Magnin; Luis Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans.

Authors:  M Boly; E Balteau; C Schnakers; C Degueldre; G Moonen; A Luxen; C Phillips; P Peigneux; P Maquet; S Laureys
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Consciousness and cerebral baseline activity fluctuations.

Authors:  Melanie Boly; Christophe Phillips; Evelyne Balteau; Caroline Schnakers; Christian Degueldre; Gustave Moonen; Andre Luxen; Philippe Peigneux; Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville; Pierre Maquet; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The role of mental distraction on the pain response in healthy young Indian adults.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Jayballabh Kumar; Indu Saxena
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-09-08

Review 6.  Higher cortical modulation of pain perception in the human brain: Psychological determinant.

Authors:  Andrew Cn Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Use of hypnosis in the treatment of pain.

Authors:  Jin-Seong Lee; Young Don Pyun
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2012-04-04

8.  Brain processing of pain in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome.

Authors:  Alexandra Markl; Tao Yu; Dominik Vogel; Friedemann Müller; Boris Kotchoubey; Simone Lang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Anticipation of pain enhances the nociceptive transmission and functional connectivity within pain network in rats.

Authors:  Jin-Yan Wang; Han-Ti Zhang; Jing-Yu Chang; Donald J Woodward; Luiz A Baccalá; Fei Luo
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.395

10.  Effectiveness of medical hypnosis for pain reduction and faster wound healing in pediatric acute burn injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen J Chester; Kellie Stockton; Alexandra De Young; Belinda Kipping; Zephanie Tyack; Bronwyn Griffin; Ralph L Chester; Roy M Kimble
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.