Literature DB >> 1618565

Fracture bracing the humerus.

P Camden1, S Nade.   

Abstract

The use of humeral fracture braces has become our preferred method of treatment for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. These braces are easy to apply and adjust; the patient's acceptance of this method of treatment is high. We compared this method of treatment with the traditional method of plaster U-slab immobilization. A group of patients treated with a plaster U-slab were matched for type and level of fracture with a group treated with a humeral fracture brace and compared with regard to fracture healing and functional outcome. There was no difference between groups for healing time and final alignment of the fracture. However, there was a greater range of elbow motion at the time of union in the fracture brace group (11 degrees-126 degrees) compared with the U-slab group (50 degrees-119 degrees P less than 0.05). These results confirmed that humeral fracture bracing permits greater functional use of the limb without affecting fracture healing and alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1618565     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(05)80008-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

1.  Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  J A K Toivanen; J Nieminen; H-J Laine; S E Honkonen; M J Järvinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  U cast or functional bracing following fractures of the shaft of humerus.

Authors:  Ian J Persad; Sashi Kommu
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Humeral shaft fractures treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing: what are the consequences for the rotator cuff?

Authors:  Michele Arcangelo Verdano; Andrea Pellegrini; Paolo Schiavi; Luca Somenzi; Giorgio Concari; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture.

Authors:  T W Lau; F Leung; C F Chan; S P Chow
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Functional long-term outcome of the shoulder after antegrade intramedullary nailing in humeral diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Andrea Devecchi; Cosimo Costantino; Enrico Vaienti
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-03-01

6.  Less invasive plate osteosynthesis in humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Theerachai Apivatthakakul; Chanakarn Phornphutkul; Anupong Laohapoonrungsee; Yuddhasert Sirirungruangsarn
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  [Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis of proximal humeral shaft fractures with long PHILOS plates].

Authors:  A Brunner; S Thormann; R Babst
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Posterior percutaneous plating of the humerus.

Authors:  Khaled M Balam; Abdallah S Zahrany
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-16

9.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humerus diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  M Shantharam Shetty; M Ajith Kumar; Kt Sujay; Abhishek R Kini; Kiran G Kanthi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Complications and outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous plating for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Jin Park; Seong Yup Jeong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-05-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.