Literature DB >> 16185602

[Application of the Gail method of calculating risk in the population of Valencia].

Ismael Pascual Pastor Climente1, María M Morales Suárez-Varela, Agustín Llopis González, José F Magraner Gil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to verify whether the method defined by Gail is applicable and predictive in a population of women in Valencia (Spain). POPULATION AND METHODS: Of the 685 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and attended-to in 2000-2001, 186 incident cases were identified. The variables studied were obtained from a specific questionnaire which included characteristics of reproductive history, number of biopsies and contraceptive pill consumption prior to the diagnosis. Using the model of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), an adaptation of the Gail model, the risk of developing breast cancer at 5 years was estimated.
RESULTS: Only 40% of those women diagnosed as having breast cancer would have been identified as a high-risk patient by the Gail method. With our population group, the method detected the elderly women with a medical history of breast cancer who developed advanced stage disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The Gail method does not adapt well to the study population of Valencia. It would be necessary to add other risk-factors to the Gail method so as to identify more patients in our area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16185602     DOI: 10.1007/bf02716549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  22 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk assessment: Who holds the magic crystal ball?

Authors:  S Masood
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  [Epidemiological characteristics of breast cancer development in pre and postmenopausal women].

Authors:  M C Díez Collar; P Ortega Molina; R Villanueva Orbaiz; R Albaladejo Vicente; P Astasio Arbiza; M E Calle Purón
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2000-09-16       Impact factor: 1.725

3.  Breast cancer risk in young women and history of selected medical conditions.

Authors:  H A Weiss; L A Brinton; N A Potischman; D Brogan; R J Coates; M D Gammon; K E Malone; J B Schoenberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Revisions in the risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Program at Group Health Cooperative.

Authors:  S H Taplin; R S Thompson; F Schnitzer; C Anderman; V Immanuel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  High-risk populations as targets for breast cancer prevention trials.

Authors:  V G Vogel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  BRCA1 mutations and breast cancer in the general population: analyses in women before age 35 years and in women before age 45 years with first-degree family history.

Authors:  K E Malone; J R Daling; J D Thompson; C A O'Brien; L V Francisco; E A Ostrander
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Risk factors for breast cancer in Chinese women of Beijing.

Authors:  S C Tao; M C Yu; R K Ross; K W Xiu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Risk factors for breast cancer. Case-control study results.

Authors:  A Azzena; T Zen; A Ferrara; V Brunetti; C Vasile; M Marchetti
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 0.196

10.  Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women.

Authors:  F Clavel-Chapelon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Korean risk assessment model for breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Boyoung Park; Seung Hyun Ma; Aesun Shin; Myung-Chul Chang; Ji-Yeob Choi; Sungwan Kim; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Daehee Kang; Keun-Young Yoo; Sue K Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  An assessment of existing models for individualized breast cancer risk estimation in a screening program in Spain.

Authors:  Arantzazu Arrospide; Carles Forné; Montse Rué; Núria Torà; Javier Mar; Marisa Baré
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Assessment of the risk of developing breast cancer using the Gail model in Asian females: A systematic review.

Authors:  Solikhah Solikhah; Sitti Nurdjannah
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.