Robert MacLaren1, Patrick W Sullivan. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA. rob.maclaren@uchsc.edu
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the expected costs of short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation (< 24, 24-72, and > 72 hrs, respectively) with propofol, lorazepam, and midazolam in an intensive care unit. METHODS: Decision-analysis models were constructed for each sedative and each duration by using institutional costs associated with drug administration and adverse events (including personnel time). Costs were expressed in 2002 U.S. dollars. Adverse events were agitation, hypertriglyceridemia and/or pancreatitis, hypotension, nutritional changes, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and prolonged awakening and/or extubation. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to obtain durations of sedation, the incidence of outcomes, and cost estimates of outcomes. The ability to maintain specific levels of sedation was assumed equivalent among the sedatives. Univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the cost-driving variables, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted by using second-order Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Weighted mean durations of sedation from 50 studies were 13.46 (short term), 45.27 (intermediate term), and 119.78 (long term) hours. Expected costs for sedation with lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol, respectively, were 497 dollars, 294 dollars, and 272 dollars short term; 932 dollars, 587 dollars, and 674 dollars intermediate term; and 1604 dollars, 1737 dollars, and 2033 dollars long term. Propofol was least costly in 86% of the short-term simulations, midazolam was least costly in 97.5% of the intermediate-term simulations, and lorazepam was least costly in 84% of the long-term simulations. The most important cost-driver for all sedatives was drug cost. Prolonged extubation after sedation was an important cost-driver for lorazepam and midazolam, especially as sedation was lengthened. CONCLUSION: Propofol, midazolam, and lorazepam had the lowest expected costs for short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation, respectively. Many factors aside from drug costs influenced the cost of sedation.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the expected costs of short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation (< 24, 24-72, and > 72 hrs, respectively) with propofol, lorazepam, and midazolam in an intensive care unit. METHODS: Decision-analysis models were constructed for each sedative and each duration by using institutional costs associated with drug administration and adverse events (including personnel time). Costs were expressed in 2002 U.S. dollars. Adverse events were agitation, hypertriglyceridemia and/or pancreatitis, hypotension, nutritional changes, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and prolonged awakening and/or extubation. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to obtain durations of sedation, the incidence of outcomes, and cost estimates of outcomes. The ability to maintain specific levels of sedation was assumed equivalent among the sedatives. Univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the cost-driving variables, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted by using second-order Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Weighted mean durations of sedation from 50 studies were 13.46 (short term), 45.27 (intermediate term), and 119.78 (long term) hours. Expected costs for sedation with lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol, respectively, were 497 dollars, 294 dollars, and 272 dollars short term; 932 dollars, 587 dollars, and 674 dollars intermediate term; and 1604 dollars, 1737 dollars, and 2033 dollars long term. Propofol was least costly in 86% of the short-term simulations, midazolam was least costly in 97.5% of the intermediate-term simulations, and lorazepam was least costly in 84% of the long-term simulations. The most important cost-driver for all sedatives was drug cost. Prolonged extubation after sedation was an important cost-driver for lorazepam and midazolam, especially as sedation was lengthened. CONCLUSION:Propofol, midazolam, and lorazepam had the lowest expected costs for short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation, respectively. Many factors aside from drug costs influenced the cost of sedation.
Authors: Ameldina Ceric; Teresa L May; Anna Lybeck; Tobias Cronberg; David B Seder; Richard R Riker; Christian Hassager; Jesper Kjaergaard; Zana Haxhija; Hans Friberg; Josef Dankiewicz; Niklas Nielsen Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 3.532
Authors: Christopher E Cox; Shelby D Reed; Joseph A Govert; Jo E Rodgers; Stacy Campbell-Bright; John P Kress; Shannon S Carson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Lorenzo Pradelli; Massimiliano Povero; Hartmut Bürkle; Tim-Gerald Kampmeier; Giorgio Della-Rocca; Astrid Feuersenger; Jean-Francois Baron; Martin Westphal Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2017-11-09
Authors: Matthew S Duprey; Nada S Al-Qadheeb; Nick O'Donnell; Keith B Hoffman; Jonathan Weinstock; Christopher Madias; Mo Dimbil; John W Devlin Journal: Drugs Real World Outcomes Date: 2019-09
Authors: Greer Waldrop; Seyed A Safavynia; Megan E Barra; Brian L Edlow; Nicholas D Schiff; Jan Claassen; Sachin Agarwal; David A Berlin; Amelia K Boehme; Daniel Brodie; Jacky M Choi; Kevin Doyle; Joseph J Fins; Wolfgang Ganglberger; Katherine Hoffman; Aaron M Mittel; David Roh; Shibani S Mukerji; Caroline Der Nigoghossian; Soojin Park; Edward J Schenck; John Salazar-Schicchi; Qi Shen; Evan Sholle; Angela G Velazquez; Maria C Walline; M Brandon Westover; Emery N Brown; Jonathan Victor Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 11.274